User talk:Drsjpdc

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

I resign. Good bye. Tired of fighting to improve Wikipedia. ^Д-р_{СДжП,ДС} 15:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated violations of a topic ban that was agreed to as a condition of the removal of a community ban. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drsjpdc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was community banned some 4-5 years ago, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Drsjpdc/Archive instigated by the people who's names anyone who really cares to investigate this injustice Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Drsjpdc/Archive, can readily find on the page with the whole sordid mess listed for all to see. I admit, and admitted then that as a newbie I made errors in editing and certainly gave editors with more experience some reason to be annoyed with my efforts. But it has risen to an all out vendetta against me. The first time 4-5 years ago, it was so egregious, that Jimmy Wales himself interceded to get my ban lifted. I basically self-exiled for four years, while founding and running a very successful other wiki, now getting getting some 15M hits/week. When I came back, I edited only very peripherally to my profession's area. When dared to write articles (which have been reviewed and stand BTW) These same guys came after me claiming that I was "self promoting"... That was a blatant lie. I recall writing NO ARTICLES about me at all. I dare them to show even ONE. If writing even peripherally about this subject is self promotion, then any MD cannot write about medicine without self promoting, and no golfer can wrote about golf, etc.... you have to have one set of rules. (seems not). My only transgression was to forget to kneel down to these Gods of this subject to beg permission to start writing again in my own profession. For that I apologize.

List of innocent people smeared by these same people:
User:Platinumphotographer : Comment - This poor guy got caught in this vendetta, only because 4 years ago, he asked me to help him set up a USER page... I naively entered his account to do that, and it go him labeled my sockpuppet and he was banned for life?
User:ModTheRod : Comment - this guy's sin was to live in New Jersey, and think I actually deserved a bio on this encyclopedia...and put is back up after it was removed once. Banned or life as a "presumed sockpuppet" of mine.... I still have no idea who this is, poor guy.
User:DigitalC and User:Waynethegoblin, both viciously smeared as possible "meatpuppets" and thankfully acquitted.

Now, I learned that another doctor User:Backdoc47, who it turns out by coincidence works in my building, has been banned in this same vendetta, and several quality articles in areas having NOTHING to do with Chiropractic have simply been deleted claiming that they were clearly "done by someone with wiki experience" (presumably because they were of such high quality !! ??? and, because he was editing from this building, where we share through switch, one Time Warner connection. Innocent people are being hurt. Now that this was done, we know that anyone caring to fix this issue will be accused by these people of being my "sockpuppet" or "meatpuppet"... so theoretically these innocent people can never have their bios appear in Wikipedia, as punishment for this surgeon being in my building???

This has gone too far. I am now asking a fair hearing, and will go to the highest authorities if no one cares to look at the facts. It should be clear to those not directly involved in this brouhaha that certain people, including at least one sysop are abusing their power to wage this vendetta. So I ask that only a sysop with NO prior connection this matter please investigate my request here. (I will work on this a bit more to include links to the information I am talking about... so please give this a couple of days before jumping in.)

^Д-р_{СДжП,ДС} 19:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The diff to Jimbo's endorsement clearly says that you were to avoid "trouble areas," and it's hard not to conclude he's talking about advocacy of chiropractic. Your initial edits in that area violated the previous topic ban but were otherwise uncontroversial. More recent edits show a slide back into obvious advocacy. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apparently, Jamie didn't actually read any of what I wrote, as I asked for a couple of days to finish my entry and, that this be judged by an objective party... Jamie jumped in while I was writing, and is the same sysop who denied User talk:Backdoc47's appeals, and cannot thus be considered objective. ^Д-р_{СДжП,ДС} 20:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You only asked that someone review it who had not been part of the original block. Now you're narrowing the criteria? Good luck with that. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Drsjpdc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Advocacy of Chiropractic" ??? So, no MD can advicate medicine and NO carpenter can advocate Carpentry??? You clearly have one set of rules for DC's and one for the rest of the world. realize that it's only the bigotry against my profession which make you say that any article positive towards it is self promotion. Think that would stand up in a courtroom? Good luck with that argument !!! The punishment of innocent third parties is now exposing me to possible legal liability, and I am being libeled as well. I apparently have to take this to the arb committee and perhaps to legal counsel ^Д-р_{СДжП,ДС} 20:38, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Advocacy of Chiropractic" ??? So, no MD can advicate medicine and NO carpenter can advocate Carpentry??? You clearly have one set of rules for DC's and one for the rest of the world. realize that it's only the  bigotry against my profession which make you say that any article positive towards it is self promotion. Think that would stand up in a courtroom? Good luck with that argument !!! The punishment of innocent third parties is now exposing me to possible legal liability, and I am being libeled as well. I apparently have to take this to the arb committee and perhaps to legal counsel <sup><small><font color="Red">[[User talk:Drsjpdc|Д-р]]</font></small></sup><sub style="margin-left:-3.2ex;"><small><font color="blue">[[User talk:Drsjpdc|СДжП,ДС]]</font></small></sub> 20:38, 1 April 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Advocacy of Chiropractic" ??? So, no MD can advicate medicine and NO carpenter can advocate Carpentry??? You clearly have one set of rules for DC's and one for the rest of the world. realize that it's only the  bigotry against my profession which make you say that any article positive towards it is self promotion. Think that would stand up in a courtroom? Good luck with that argument !!! The punishment of innocent third parties is now exposing me to possible legal liability, and I am being libeled as well. I apparently have to take this to the arb committee and perhaps to legal counsel <sup><small><font color="Red">[[User talk:Drsjpdc|Д-р]]</font></small></sup><sub style="margin-left:-3.2ex;"><small><font color="blue">[[User talk:Drsjpdc|СДжП,ДС]]</font></small></sub> 20:38, 1 April 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Advocacy of Chiropractic" ??? So, no MD can advicate medicine and NO carpenter can advocate Carpentry??? You clearly have one set of rules for DC's and one for the rest of the world. realize that it's only the  bigotry against my profession which make you say that any article positive towards it is self promotion. Think that would stand up in a courtroom? Good luck with that argument !!! The punishment of innocent third parties is now exposing me to possible legal liability, and I am being libeled as well. I apparently have to take this to the arb committee and perhaps to legal counsel <sup><small><font color="Red">[[User talk:Drsjpdc|Д-р]]</font></small></sup><sub style="margin-left:-3.2ex;"><small><font color="blue">[[User talk:Drsjpdc|СДжП,ДС]]</font></small></sub> 20:38, 1 April 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}