User talk:Emesee/Archive 1
A tag has been placed on Tomiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nick—Contact/Contribs 09:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article List of Superfund sites by state, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 00:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of Superfund sites by state
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Superfund sites by state, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Superfund sites by state. Thank you.--User:Iridescenti
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
My user page
Since of the three two were indefblocked for repeat vandalism, and the third took the argument to AN/I and didn't get a single voice in support, I believe I'll survive - iridescenti (talk to me!) 20:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
help desk
I've responded at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Project_mentor... ··coelacan 20:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
deletion review of List of Philippine Presidents by longevity
I've asked for a deletion review of List of Philippine Presidents by longevity. Since you participated in the deletion discussion for this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -Fagles 20:23, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to Toilet roll holder
Could you explain your reasoning behind this edit? You've deleted an image with the summary "removed unsourced image"; however, the page is clearly sourced and PD released on Commons — iridescenti (talk to me!) 22:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- It seems to me that the image degrades the overall user experience and image of Wikipedia. If you would like to revert my edit because feel that the image enhances the image and quality of information being conveyed at Wikipedia, you can probably either put it back or find an appropriate spot to build consensus on the issue. It's deletion had nothing to do with the commented comment. --Remi 10:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)