User talk:EmilCioran1195

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring on an IRANPOL article. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 21:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for ARBPIA and NPA violations. Please ping me if you intend to appeal this block and I will copy that appeal onto AE (instructions on how to construct such an appeal are on that page). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 17:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

EmilCioran1195 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

what "ARBPIA and NPA violations" have I supposedly committed? I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. And if calling someone biased after them calling me biased is a "Personal Attack", then shouldn't the other user be blocked too? Surely for a 2-week block an admin has to provide diffs? This admin is clearly involved in the dispute, and has a habit of showing up wherever I edit... not even edit, but simply comment on a Talk page. And blocked for 2 weeks, for my contributions on this Talk Page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eva_Bartlett EmilCioran1195 (talk) 06:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=what "ARBPIA and [[WP:NPA|NPA]] violations" have I supposedly committed? I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. And if calling someone biased after them calling me biased is a "Personal Attack", then shouldn't the other user be blocked too? Surely for a 2-week block an admin has to provide diffs? This admin is clearly involved in the dispute, and has a habit of showing up wherever I edit... not even edit, but simply comment on a Talk page. And blocked for 2 weeks, for my contributions on this Talk Page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eva_Bartlett [[User:EmilCioran1195|EmilCioran1195]] ([[User talk:EmilCioran1195#top|talk]]) 06:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=what "ARBPIA and [[WP:NPA|NPA]] violations" have I supposedly committed? I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. And if calling someone biased after them calling me biased is a "Personal Attack", then shouldn't the other user be blocked too? Surely for a 2-week block an admin has to provide diffs? This admin is clearly involved in the dispute, and has a habit of showing up wherever I edit... not even edit, but simply comment on a Talk page. And blocked for 2 weeks, for my contributions on this Talk Page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eva_Bartlett [[User:EmilCioran1195|EmilCioran1195]] ([[User talk:EmilCioran1195#top|talk]]) 06:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=what "ARBPIA and [[WP:NPA|NPA]] violations" have I supposedly committed? I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. And if calling someone biased after them calling me biased is a "Personal Attack", then shouldn't the other user be blocked too? Surely for a 2-week block an admin has to provide diffs? This admin is clearly involved in the dispute, and has a habit of showing up wherever I edit... not even edit, but simply comment on a Talk page. And blocked for 2 weeks, for my contributions on this Talk Page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eva_Bartlett [[User:EmilCioran1195|EmilCioran1195]] ([[User talk:EmilCioran1195#top|talk]]) 06:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Again, this is an Arbitration enforcement block — the guide as to how to construct an AE appeal is on that page. The charge that I am involved in the dispute is groundless. I am not. But I am the uninvolved admin who indefinitely semiprotected the article, so of course it would make sense that I'd keep an eye on it, although actually I wasn't — I was pinged by Drmies. El_C 00:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

I don't see how this addresses the substance of my objections. (also, I have no idea what you mean when you say "this is an Arbitration enforcement block — the guide as to how to construct an AE appeal is on that page"). EmilCioran1195 (talk) 22:57, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Please refer to Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal. Again, it's on the AE page. I'm not sure I'm able to express it any more clearly. EmilCioran1195 23:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

By pasting the correct link, as you did above (Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal), that's all that is required. Obviously. Instead of just referring to AE, which, without further explanation or a link to the template, just sounds like you're trying to make this whole process as opaque and tedious as possible to avoid scrutiny. I am blocked, so I can I edit the AE? Should I use that template here? Why aren't there any clear instructions? Why are you unable unwilling to provide them? Clearly you've done this many times before. It shouldn't surprise you to learn, I haven't. EmilCioran1195 (talk) 23:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

It's clearly mentioned on the AE page, so I don't see what is so complicated there. El_C 23:43, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Because one cannot "create a new section and use the template Arbitration enforcement appeal" when one is blocked! Did that not occur to your? EmilCioran1195 (talk) 23:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

"I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict." EmilCioran1195, the ARBPIA sanctions extend to talkpages as well as actual articles (see WP:ARBPIA4).     ←   ZScarpia   13:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

What has Eva Bartlett to do with the Arab-Israeli conflict? Because the word "Gaza" appears once in her article? EmilCioran1195 (talk) 22:57, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by EmilCioran1195

Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved administrators" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.

To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).

Appealing user

EmilCioran1195 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – EmilCioran1195 (talk) 23:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Sanction being appealed

2 week block for "ARBPIA and NPA violations"

Administrator imposing the sanction

El_C (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Notification of that administrator

The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

Statement by EmilCioran1195

what "ARBPIA and NPA violations" have I supposedly committed? I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. And if calling someone biased after them calling me biased is a "Personal Attack", then shouldn't the other user be blocked too? Surely for a 2-week block an admin has to provide diffs? This admin is clearly involved in the dispute, and has a habit of showing up wherever I edit... not even edit, but simply comment on a Talk page. And blocked for 2 weeks, for my contributions on this Talk Page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eva_Bartlett EmilCioran1195 (talk) 06:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Result of the appeal by EmilCioran1195

This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.