User talk:Ermenrich

== Just copy the source code and paste it on the talk page of the user you wish to invite.

This user has been invited WikiProject Prussia please consider checking us out.

==

Kaiser Kitkat (talk)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 20:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

I’m having trouble on the mobile app responding there , @Jeppiz:, would you mind copying over that I didn’t believe that reverting someone refusing to follow wp:bold counted and I accept that it is if it turns out to be. Thanks—Ermenrich (talk)

@ST47:, I think Jeppiz must’ve gone offline. Maybe you’d be willing to copy that over there? Not sure why the mobile version won’t let me post at AN3.—Ermenrich (talk)

Actually never mind.—Ermenrich (talk)

Jinn

On my watchlist, you need to stop reverting now, I'll deal with it. Doug Weller talk 17:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Question and overview

Hi,

I'd also ask a favor, please check this edit ([1]) and the whole Category:International terrorism, for possible POV issues. I know the topic is sensitive in spite of Ukrainian and Russian conflicts, bur certainly the military intervention is Syria is quite a different issue like Crimea's at first glance...(the phrase terrorism is often used as an accusation or a claim, causus belli from a certain point of view, however it is dangerous and serious charge, so I think any party should be twice as careful in such topics - I have to also add the category just created consist only events where Russia is involved however many other events, issues may fit from varuious other countries, this also raise a few doubts and concerns).(KIENGIR (talk) 19:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC))

KIENGIR, that edit is very obvious a violation of NPOV and I've reverted it. It'll take me a while longer to look at the whole category though.--Ermenrich (talk) 20:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Hedy Lamarr

Hi,

there is a discussion in the talk. Since we worked and discussed such issues, take look on it please, not a major issue, but concerning. Feel free to add any opinion, I did everything with good faith, but already told everything and this point of my behalf is nothing more to do..(an interesting case study anyway).(KIENGIR (talk) 11:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC))

Hi KIENGIR, in this particular case I think it's probably better to let it go. You are technically right, I think, but the fact that Hedy Lamar is someone known to Hollywood buffs rather than history buffs means that they are unlikely to accept a strange (though correct) term like Cisleithania being used instead of Austria or the better-known Austria-Hungary. I would leave it be and turn my attention to other matters.--Ermenrich (talk) 15:32, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Well, anyway thank for the reinforcement that I did not lost my precisity :). Another technical thing then, I was editing the Attila page recently and opening the the surface I noticed that probably since 2011 a still valid 1RR-24h rule is imposed on the page, immediately sanctionable...I think this has been ingnored, because you made more than one recently, so I just warn you without knowing do not run into anything inconvenient...(funnily I noticed also now...). Cheers.(KIENGIR (talk) 17:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC))

Small text== Fringe edits by an "account on mission” ==

Hello, I got awareness of fringe edits by Hunan201p (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Hunan201p) promotion racist ideas of “blonde haired and blue eyed” warriors in East Asia. His used references do not support these claims and only mention an unknown and likely heterogeneous origin in the case of the Xianbei. More fringe are his edits on blonde (hair colour) or Genghis Khan (also see talkpage). Rashid al-din did not say Genghis had red hair, but wrote about Genghis reaction to the skin colour of his grandchild which was not reddish but swarty. I have included the direct quote and a link yesterday, but currently no one has reacted. I m writing you as well because you seem to be a good editor and know much about Wikipedia rules. I think many edits of Hunan violate WP:SCIRS and WP:WEIGHT. Additionally some things about him remember me on the long term vandal Tirgil34 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Tirgil34). I mean blonde or red haired turks are his main target, as seemingly Hunan. Anyway, someone should watch this user carefully. Best regards.38.121.43.208 (talk) 15:07, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Ermenrich. I would like to point out that the above user is likely WorldCreaterFighter, a notorious sockmaster, based on his edit history regarding me and various subjects WorldCreaterFighter is known to obsessively edit, such as Austroasiatic languages. Multiple active sockpuppet investigations involve his name as I type this. - Hunan201p (talk) 01:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Hunan201p, I'd suggest going to WP:SPI if you haven't already. Seems pretty suspicious.--Ermenrich (talk) 13:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Please respect what is in the references

Even if it annoys you. --Posp68 (talk) 17:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

You're adding your own interpretation to a secondary source and trying to cite a biased source from 1938 about how Sudeten-Germans were just immigrants or something. I suggest you investigate Wikipedia's policies on sourcing, Posp68.--Ermenrich (talk) 18:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

The Paris Peace Conference did not take this into consideration, neither did the American Delegation. Yes or No? The Germans arrived to the Czech Lands in every century, including many since 1850. Yes or No? If No, Please give references.

The U.S. commission to the Paris Peace Conference issued a declaration which gave unanimous support for "uniti of Czech Lands". Yes or No? If No, Please give references. --Posp68 (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

It seems you are a German of the right old type--Posp68 (talk) 19:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)