User talk:Exteahans71: Difference between revisions
→Production of Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken: new section |
Exteahans71 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
I have moved this to draft. This is nowhere near ready for article space. Please do not attempt to create articles such as this directly in article space. I doubt that the production of this film is notable enough to warrant an article, but it certainly should to be worked on in article space. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 21:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC) |
I have moved this to draft. This is nowhere near ready for article space. Please do not attempt to create articles such as this directly in article space. I doubt that the production of this film is notable enough to warrant an article, but it certainly should to be worked on in article space. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 21:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
:Ok. [[User:Exteahans71|Exteahans71]] ([[User talk:Exteahans71#top|talk]]) 21:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:45, 3 April 2024
Removing other users' comments
Please do not remove other users' messages from talk pages like you did here. You've already been warned about this once. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! lizthegrey (talk) 15:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Exteahans71 (talk) 15:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
Please give a read to WP:CIR and WP:IDHT. You cannot just "oops sorry" your way out or delete warnings given to you, you are no longer new here having made over 1000 edits and been here almost 5 months. Please engage constructively with your ANI thread to show you intend to listen to feedback. lizthegrey (talk) 15:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken. You have had more than one edit warring warnings, but you are again edit warring. Stop doing this. You deleted the warnings so we take that as acknowledgement that you have seen them. When your changes are reverted it is up to you to discuss the edits on the article's talk page and attempt to get consensus for them. See WP:BRD. The next step is going to be a request for a block at one of the admin boards. Meters (talk) 21:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I have moved this to draft. This is nowhere near ready for article space. Please do not attempt to create articles such as this directly in article space. I doubt that the production of this film is notable enough to warrant an article, but it certainly should to be worked on in article space. Meters (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. Exteahans71 (talk) 21:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)