User talk:Forsts23: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎3RR: blocked
Line 42: Line 42:


<div class="user-block"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing, for a period of '''48 hours''', for '''violation of the [[WP:3RR|three revert rule]] at [[Mitanni]]'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal the block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (t)]] [[Special:Contributions/Black_Kite|(c)]] 11:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 -->
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing, for a period of '''48 hours''', for '''violation of the [[WP:3RR|three revert rule]] at [[Mitanni]]'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal the block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (t)]] [[Special:Contributions/Black_Kite|(c)]] 11:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 -->

== Arbitration enforcement request ==

As I understand it, your edit-warring at Mitanni and Urartu are in breach of the sanctions you were warned about last month, and I have raised an enforcement request at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Forsts23]]. I or someone else will relay any comments you make here to that page. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 15:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:00, 10 August 2010


Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Forsts23! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 talk 18:36, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nairi

Hey there!

Hello, Forsts23. You have new messages at Aregakn's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aregakn (talk) 13:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Forsts23. You have new messages at Aregakn's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aregakn (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sanction warning

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. Stifle (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Urartu. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are a sock of a banned user. If you are not, pray think twice about joining the Armenian troll cloud in their disruption. --dab (𒁳) 11:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mitanni

You're hardly one to talk about discussion, given you haven't used the talk page in weeks and haven't addressed the clear and compelling reasons why that material violates explicit Wikipedia policies, which I laid out with plenty of advance warning on said talk page. Thanatosimii (talk) 00:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mitanni. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. you are actually at 4RR Dougweller (talk) 04:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Forsts23_reported_by_User:Seb_az86556_.28Result:_.29. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 48 hours, for violation of the three revert rule at Mitanni. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 11:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement request

As I understand it, your edit-warring at Mitanni and Urartu are in breach of the sanctions you were warned about last month, and I have raised an enforcement request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Forsts23. I or someone else will relay any comments you make here to that page. Dougweller (talk) 15:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]