User talk:Freakofnurture: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Freakofnurture (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
Just like your user page screen shot summary says it happens - for more exciting details see-
Just like your user page screen shot summary says it happens - for more exciting details see-
[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Categorization]] - cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 17:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Categorization]] - cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 17:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
:I only stumbled into this when I noticed that some categories had been aggressively emptied and then tagged as "db-empty" or whatever. CFD exists for a reason, I think. As far as practical matters go, categories which become exceedingly populous are typically broken into smaller ones (with the occasionally noteworthy exception, e.g. [[:Category:Living people]]). I'll stop revert the guy's edits, but I would generally have more confidence in a discussion at CFD than on the talk page of a specific (and daresay cliquish?) wiki-project. —<tt>'''[[special:contributions/freakofnurture|freak]]([[w:en:user talk:freakofnurture|talk]])'''</tt> 17:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
:I only stumbled into this when I noticed that some categories had been aggressively emptied and then tagged as "db-empty" or whatever. CFD exists for a reason, I think. As far as practical matters go, categories which become exceedingly populous are typically broken into smaller ones (with the occasionally noteworthy exception, e.g. [[:Category:Living people]]). I'll stop reverting the guy's edits, but I would generally have more confidence in a discussion at CFD than on the talk page of a specific (and daresay cliquish?) wiki-project. —<tt>'''[[special:contributions/freakofnurture|freak]]([[w:en:user talk:freakofnurture|talk]])'''</tt> 17:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
::Agree with you on this one. I reverted one category earlier tonight. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 17:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
::Agree with you on this one. I reverted one category earlier tonight. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 17:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
:::So let's send the affected categories to ''Categories for '''Discussion''''' in hopes of a broader "consensus" on the issue... —<tt>'''[[special:contributions/freakofnurture|freak]]([[w:en:user talk:freakofnurture|talk]])'''</tt> 17:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:48, 7 October 2007

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Votes for_banning

Wikipedia:Votes for_banning, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Votes for_banning and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Votes for_banning during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mercury 00:34, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

Thanks for the clean-up. :) --Moonriddengirl 20:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oz films

Just like your user page screen shot summary says it happens - for more exciting details see- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Categorization - cheers SatuSuro 17:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I only stumbled into this when I noticed that some categories had been aggressively emptied and then tagged as "db-empty" or whatever. CFD exists for a reason, I think. As far as practical matters go, categories which become exceedingly populous are typically broken into smaller ones (with the occasionally noteworthy exception, e.g. Category:Living people). I'll stop reverting the guy's edits, but I would generally have more confidence in a discussion at CFD than on the talk page of a specific (and daresay cliquish?) wiki-project. —freak(talk) 17:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with you on this one. I reverted one category earlier tonight. Orderinchaos 17:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So let's send the affected categories to Categories for Discussion in hopes of a broader "consensus" on the issue... —freak(talk) 17:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]