User talk:Horope

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Horope. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Horope (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yamla keeps on saying WP:SO is my "best bet" - yet I believe the block has been there long enough for it to be lifted. I personally regret using an account for strawman sockpuppetry. If lifted, I can continue my work on Wikipedia. I understand my breaching of Wikipedia rules was a gross one, but one chance should be given, especially after looking at my contributions. It gives away my goals. Since the block here is apparently on the person, and wouldn't be lifted until it is on the main account, can it be lifted here? Please check the 7,000+ contributions on User:Danloud and User:Mspriz. But clearly, restricting a user and declining the request gives some people some sort of a dominating feeling. I've requested many times, twice on Danloud, once on Mspriz, and finally here. Please realise, I have understood my mistake and promise to avoid it. Horope (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] keeps on saying [[WP:SO]] is my "best bet" - yet I believe the block has been there long enough for it to be lifted. I personally regret using an account for strawman sockpuppetry. If lifted, I can continue my work on Wikipedia. I understand my breaching of Wikipedia rules was a gross one, but one chance should be given, especially after looking at my contributions. It gives away my goals. Since the block here is apparently on the person, and wouldn't be lifted until it is on the main account, can it be lifted here? Please check the 7,000+ contributions on [[User:Danloud]] and [[User:Mspriz]]. But clearly, restricting a user and declining the request gives some people some sort of a dominating feeling. I've requested many times, twice on Danloud, once on Mspriz, and finally here. Please realise, I have understood my mistake and promise to avoid it. [[User:Horope|Horope]] ([[User talk:Horope#top|talk]]) 14:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] keeps on saying [[WP:SO]] is my "best bet" - yet I believe the block has been there long enough for it to be lifted. I personally regret using an account for strawman sockpuppetry. If lifted, I can continue my work on Wikipedia. I understand my breaching of Wikipedia rules was a gross one, but one chance should be given, especially after looking at my contributions. It gives away my goals. Since the block here is apparently on the person, and wouldn't be lifted until it is on the main account, can it be lifted here? Please check the 7,000+ contributions on [[User:Danloud]] and [[User:Mspriz]]. But clearly, restricting a user and declining the request gives some people some sort of a dominating feeling. I've requested many times, twice on Danloud, once on Mspriz, and finally here. Please realise, I have understood my mistake and promise to avoid it. [[User:Horope|Horope]] ([[User talk:Horope#top|talk]]) 14:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] keeps on saying [[WP:SO]] is my "best bet" - yet I believe the block has been there long enough for it to be lifted. I personally regret using an account for strawman sockpuppetry. If lifted, I can continue my work on Wikipedia. I understand my breaching of Wikipedia rules was a gross one, but one chance should be given, especially after looking at my contributions. It gives away my goals. Since the block here is apparently on the person, and wouldn't be lifted until it is on the main account, can it be lifted here? Please check the 7,000+ contributions on [[User:Danloud]] and [[User:Mspriz]]. But clearly, restricting a user and declining the request gives some people some sort of a dominating feeling. I've requested many times, twice on Danloud, once on Mspriz, and finally here. Please realise, I have understood my mistake and promise to avoid it. [[User:Horope|Horope]] ([[User talk:Horope#top|talk]]) 14:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• One of the two socks you noted, Mspriz, was socking as recently as a few days ago before they were CU-blocked. No one is going to even consider unblocking you for at least six months without socking.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Bbb23 My IP ban expired on November 2021, and I used my account Mspriz, to gain about a 1,000 edits, a Million Award, and even elect an article to GA. What type of sockpuppeting is that? I have no malicious goals. Its just weird how I am restricted from editing due to a mistake, I did, by posing as a strawman sock almost a year ago. I clearly am here to build a Wikipedia, and that's evident through my edits. Even after seeing my edits, I should be given a second chance. I've waited for 3 months after my main account Danloud got banned along this account. I have no other choices to continue my editing since I'm restricted. That is why I am asking the ban to be lifted. I had done a mistake, and I regret it. The block occurred on August, it has been six months. How the hell am I still blocked considering I am clearly a valuable editor, and understand my mistakes. I should be given a chance, and the timeline shouldn't be extended anymore. Otherwise its clearly unfair. People like abusing power. Simply put. Most people on Wikipedia are pretty useless, and it hurts to see at this point. Articles clearly need improvement. They're just put on halt, and I keep on pressing the edit button. I've been begging enough for at least one chance. Horope (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)