User talk:Igny: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
Line 447: Line 447:
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 22:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)</div>
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 22:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0072 -->
<!-- EdwardsBot 0072 -->

== Why are you different? :) ==

Hi Igny,

I am looking at some current comments at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment]], and I recall that in the past, you were the only editor (IIRC) who was able to apply [[WP:FORGIVE]] and say something nice about "the other side". I wonder: what makes you so different from many other editors? And more to the point: how can we make them behave more like you? Since I think you are one of the few editors respected by "both sides", could I interest you in launching some meditations? I am afraid that this topic area will not become peaceful till editors learn to forget and forgive. PS. Have you ever considered applying for an adminship? --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 15:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:16, 24 September 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

Please don't attempt to move this page again. There was no consensus for the move. If you keep moving it without consensus, you're liable to get blocked. GedUK  21:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

RE (Arb)

Please realize: I do not want anyone of you to be sanctioned, but I must prepare fair report (as I see it) for the reasons of integrity and for the good of this project. Yes, you are right in general: I am on a very wrong track here. This is something to be fixed righ now.Biophys (talk) 14:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

2008 South Ossetia War title

I would like to know your opinion concerning a proposal I made, which I think represents a decent compromise.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 03:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

I dutifully answered your Q over at the ref desk

Sorry that I'm a few days late. I majored in finance and my explanation was very intuitive and very helpful. 66.231.146.7 (talk) 20:38, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

AE

I have filed an AE request concering your recent comments. It is here. Colchicum (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

Blocked for 31 hours

Comments such as this are unhelpful. Please do not make unfounded comments of covert collusion and other such nonsense. Doing so adds to the noise of the arbitration case and is inconsiderate of the other parties. In future, to avoid the assumption of bad faith, remember that only substantiated accusations should be made. If at any point you have a qualm with another editor's comment, whether it be directed at you or at another party, you are free to message or e-mail me; I or another clerk will do our best to ensure that the edit is fully scrutinised, and removed if necessary. AGK 12:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for wasting your time. (Igny (talk) 13:28, 19 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

thanks

Thanks for the supportive comment at my request for amendment [1]. If it's not too much to ask I was wondering if you could just note there that me and you were on the opposite sides of the issues prior and during the EEML case. Otherwise, since it's been several months since the case, people might have forgotten and think you're one of the "Polish editors" or something and discount your opinion unduly.radek (talk) 04:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mass killings under Communist regimes

There is a reply to your question Here thanks mark nutley (talk) 09:37, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

neutral notification Collect (talk) 12:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

definition of "mass"

apologies for my confusing tag here. the quoted material is from the definition of the term "mass", not the outcome of the poison, which was always death, varying in suffering and time. The fact that poisons were tested on gulag prisoners resulting in death is not disputed. the previous undo made the comment "how is this relevant to the page?" my tag was to clarify the link was not in relevance to the 5-6 notable victims killed by the poisons, but rather the "large number of people" killed in testing of the poisons. i think paul undid the previous link thinking 5-6 deaths did not qualify as "mass killing", which i agree. however the "mass killings" of those whom served as guinea pigs, should justify the link remaining. Darkstar1st (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC) the testing of the poisons in the gulag: "affecting a large number of people")[reply]

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you different? :)

Hi Igny,

I am looking at some current comments at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment, and I recall that in the past, you were the only editor (IIRC) who was able to apply WP:FORGIVE and say something nice about "the other side". I wonder: what makes you so different from many other editors? And more to the point: how can we make them behave more like you? Since I think you are one of the few editors respected by "both sides", could I interest you in launching some meditations? I am afraid that this topic area will not become peaceful till editors learn to forget and forgive. PS. Have you ever considered applying for an adminship? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 15:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]