User talk:Kbdank71

December CfD nominations

I've gotten to the point where I can't close any of the remaining December nominations on Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Working, because I've either initiated them or commented on them. Feel like closing any of the ones you did not also comment upon?--Mike Selinker (talk) 22:15, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Can't do them today, but I'll take a look at them tomorrow. --Kbdank71 19:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

why

why did you delete the types of technology page? i cant do my homework now... :( ): —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.193.168 (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Looking for an admin to check me on something

A couple of editors have questioned my actions on Talk:2011 Libyan civil war, and so I'm hoping to get a couple of unbiased admins to take a look at what I did and tell me if I did something wrong. There was a very long debate about changing the page's name here, which I closed in the way I did because 75% of the votes were in favor of some form of "civil war" name. Then the page was relisted for change here, and after a week in which the oppose votes significantly outnumbered the support votes, I closed that one as no consensus. Two editors objected that since I closed the first nomination, I shouldn't have closed the second. Since I don't want this to be about me, can you look at it and see if you would have come to the same conclusion on the second nomination? Even if you wouldn't have, I'd like to know about it. Also, if there are other admins you know that might be willing to weigh in, I'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance.--Mike Selinker (talk) 14:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

I really need to log in more often. I just saw this. Not sure if my opinion matters now, but here is a very short version. a) probably wouldn't have closed the second if I had closed the first (discussing my actions with certain people have become too draining for me, so I try to avoid them like the plague), but if I had, b) it would have been a no consensus as well. --Kbdank71 15:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians who like SpongeBob SquarePants

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians who like SpongeBob SquarePants, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JamesAlan1986 20:52, 3 November 2011 (UTC)