User talk:Lightbreather: Difference between revisions
arca notification |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Gun show loophole]]== |
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Gun show loophole]]== |
||
The article [[Gun show loophole]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Gun show loophole]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Zwerg Nase|Zwerg Nase]]</small> -- [[User:Zwerg Nase|Zwerg Nase]] ([[User talk:Zwerg Nase|talk]]) 00:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC) |
The article [[Gun show loophole]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Gun show loophole]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Zwerg Nase|Zwerg Nase]]</small> -- [[User:Zwerg Nase|Zwerg Nase]] ([[User talk:Zwerg Nase|talk]]) 00:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
==Arbitration CA notice== |
|||
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Lightbreather]] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration guide]] may be of use. |
|||
Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbitration CA notice --> Given the strong community sentiment that an exception be made to Eric Corebtt's topic ban to allow him to respond on-wiki to off-wiki criticism, I have proposed that a parallel exception be granted to allow you to respond to on-wiki criticisms and attacks. I believe that the disparate treatment of you in contrast to Corbett and a certain other user who I apparently may not name is at least arguably discriminatory. [[User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)]] ([[User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|talk]]) 15:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:34, 27 October 2015
Talk:U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation. Since you had some involvement with the Talk:U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy(TALKCONT) 09:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gun show loophole
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gun show loophole you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gun show loophole
The article Gun show loophole you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gun show loophole for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gun show loophole
The article Gun show loophole you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Gun show loophole for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 00:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration CA notice
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Lightbreather and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, Given the strong community sentiment that an exception be made to Eric Corebtt's topic ban to allow him to respond on-wiki to off-wiki criticism, I have proposed that a parallel exception be granted to allow you to respond to on-wiki criticisms and attacks. I believe that the disparate treatment of you in contrast to Corbett and a certain other user who I apparently may not name is at least arguably discriminatory. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)