User talk:Liveintheforests

June 2011

Your addition to Metal objects (Out-of-place artifacts) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. When I first saw this I could see no reason for a separate article on metal objects and was considering moving any useful content into the main Ooparts article. Since I had to delete virtually all of the content as copyvio, I've turned it into a redirect to our main article. Dougweller (talk) 11:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No original research

Could we get you to read Wikipedia:No original research and WP:ORIGINAL SYN.Moxy (talk) 23:17, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Goodman article

To Liveintheforests: Thank you for the references. They show that you are really researching the subject in an open way. I am not sure how this system works and I hope this gets to you. Gelnd (talk) 03:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

As I said about external links to the Ooparts article, our policy as described at WP:NPOV says " Wikipedia aims to present competing views in proportion to their representation in reliable sources on the subject. This applies not only to article text, but to images, wikilinks, external links," - are you really tryinhg to argue that we should have equal links on both sides of the debate? Dougweller (talk) 13:48, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Theres millions of out of place artifacts all around the world, they won't be mentioned in peer reviewed science articles becuase skeptics are not interested in things they can not explain, but this does not mean they do not have to be mentioned. Old nails for example have been found embedded in rock dated millions of years old. To find this information you have you read either paranormal, ancient astronaut or phenomena books by writers such as Charles Fort, you may think this is fringe but their information is based on actual articles and reports in news clippings etc, it's all real. In David Hatcher Childress's book Technology of the Gods he has a whole chapter about anomalies found in ancient rock, if you would like to delete the links you can delete them at the bottom of the page, but at some point i would like to add a few new finds to the article. Liveintheforests (talk) 14:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately anyone can write anything they like on Wikipedia, and we have to have some criterion for deciding what to accept. Our criterion is significant coverage in reliable sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And Childress is anything but a reliable source. If his claims are discussed in reliable sources, we can use those sources. Dougweller (talk) 14:19, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok this is what i am going to do, i will collect all the references i have. I will make a section on the out of place artifacts talk page in 24 hours and i will list all the references there. Then you tell me if any of them are valid or not on the talk page, you may be suprised to hear three million year old shoes have been found and a bullet hole found in a skull thousands of years old. Liveintheforests (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]