User talk:Maneesh2312

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Maneesh2312! I am Joyson Noel and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me!} 12:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I suggest that you discuss about the concerned info at Talk:Aamir Khan, regarding why you perceive the info to be relevant to the article. It's better to achieve consensus on the matter. Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me!} 10:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

Please stop edit warring and adding unsourced data under the claim that "nothing is unnecessary as far as it is not vandalizing". You are very wrong - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. If you continue with edit wars, you will be blocked from editing. Thanks for understanding. Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Unblock request

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Maneesh2312 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

110.76.160.100 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Maneesh2312". The reason given for Maneesh2312's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investiga

• Blocking administrator: HelloAnnyong (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Unblock request does not address the reason for the block Nick-D (talk) 11:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user is asking that his autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

Maneesh2312 (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

---

IP address: 110.76.160.100 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Block ID: #3008087 (BlockList • unblock)
Blocking admin: HelloAnnyong (talk • blocks)
Block message:

Where Do I wrote the reason? Where can I find the other unblock template. I am still very new to all this and how it works. Searching for the new unblock template and will submit again

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Maneesh2312}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=HelloAnnyong | 2=<nowiki>Where Do I wrote the reason? Where can I find the other unblock template. I am still very new to all this and how it works. Searching for the new unblock template and will submit again</nowiki> | 3=110.76.160.100 | 4=3008087 | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=110.76.160.100 | 2=<nowiki>Where Do I wrote the reason? Where can I find the other unblock template. I am still very new to all this and how it works. Searching for the new unblock template and will submit again</nowiki> | 3=HelloAnnyong | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=110.76.160.100 | 2=<nowiki>Where Do I wrote the reason? Where can I find the other unblock template. I am still very new to all this and how it works. Searching for the new unblock template and will submit again</nowiki> | 3=HelloAnnyong | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

Detailed Unblock Request

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Maneesh2312 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is definitely going somewhere else. I am actually the one to spot vandalism carried by prominent Wikipedian editors against few celebrities and hey just look what happened. That user editor claims me to be a "Sock". BTW whats a sock? Yes this was the first question I got in mind after reading it for the first time but then I've now finally found out Whats a sock. You got to believe this. I actually started editing on Wiki just 5 days back as my project gave me some freetime till now but I guess I am done with it, both with Wikipedia and my freetime. I am still far away to know how things actually work here with a never ending list of rules and policies. So my dear friend, irrespective of whether you unblock me or not, let me tell you this IP is of an organisation with more than 5000 employees. So for their sake alone unblock the IP address atleast. Coming to my User ID, am afraid I'll not be continuing with anymore edits here as now I really feel Wiki articles are not neutral 'based' POV but more of its Editors 'biased' POV. Any administrator with good logical and reasoning skills over here can look into the User's profile (who reported me as Sock), his likes and dislikes and can then refer to those articles and found out themselves what hes upto. Let me ask one simple question to the Administrators here. "What does Wikipedia do if one of their editors (who's contributed immensely to Wiki) starts vandalizing (under the disguise of their popularity earned here) other articles based on his interests or should I say disinterests? Is that not "Vandalizing"?" If my edits of merely a few words of glorification is accused of SockPuppeting, then what would you term his (that user's) multiple pages of glorifying edits. I just pointed out him a few differences and discrepancies over some articles not being consistent across Wiki and here I am being accused of "Abusing Multiple Accounts". Thats a Joke. Really. I thought Wiki was different. Everyone over here can voice their views and opinions about things and people they desire. But I guess its run by a group of editors who I understand have contributed immensely but are somewhere indifferent of having neutral and unbiased views. I hope you sense and feel what I am trying to say. Finally to summarize, I request you to order an inquiry for my User account and find out that I am not the "Sock" and nowhere related to the user "Zia86Khan". I am and always will be Maneesh. Whether to unlock me or not, its now over to you buddy. Maneesh 12:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is definitely going somewhere else. I am actually the one to spot vandalism carried by prominent Wikipedian editors against few celebrities and hey just look what happened. That user editor claims me to be a "Sock". BTW whats a sock? Yes this was the first question I got in mind after reading it for the first time but then I've now finally found out Whats a sock. You got to believe this. I actually started editing on Wiki just 5 days back as my project gave me some freetime till now but I guess I am done with it, both with Wikipedia and my freetime. I am still far away to know how things actually work here with a never ending list of rules and policies. So my dear friend, irrespective of whether you unblock me or not, let me tell you this IP is of an organisation with more than 5000 employees. So for their sake alone unblock the IP address atleast. Coming to my User ID, am afraid I'll not be continuing with anymore edits here as now I really feel Wiki articles are not neutral 'based' POV but more of its Editors 'biased' POV. Any administrator with good logical and reasoning skills over here can look into the User's profile (who reported me as Sock), his likes and dislikes and can then refer to those articles and found out themselves what hes upto. Let me ask one simple question to the Administrators here. "What does Wikipedia do if one of their editors (who's contributed immensely to Wiki) starts vandalizing (under the disguise of their popularity earned here) other articles based on his interests or should I say disinterests? Is that not "Vandalizing"?" If my edits of merely a few words of glorification is accused of SockPuppeting, then what would you term his (that user's) multiple pages of glorifying edits. I just pointed out him a few differences and discrepancies over some articles not being consistent across Wiki and here I am being accused of "Abusing Multiple Accounts". Thats a Joke. Really. I thought Wiki was different. Everyone over here can voice their views and opinions about things and people they desire. But I guess its run by a group of editors who I understand have contributed immensely but are somewhere indifferent of having neutral and unbiased views. I hope you sense and feel what I am trying to say. Finally to summarize, I request you to order an inquiry for my User account and find out that I am not the "Sock" and nowhere related to the user "Zia86Khan". I am and always will be Maneesh. Whether to unlock me or not, its now over to you buddy. Maneesh 12:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is definitely going somewhere else. I am actually the one to spot vandalism carried by prominent Wikipedian editors against few celebrities and hey just look what happened. That user editor claims me to be a "Sock". BTW whats a sock? Yes this was the first question I got in mind after reading it for the first time but then I've now finally found out Whats a sock. You got to believe this. I actually started editing on Wiki just 5 days back as my project gave me some freetime till now but I guess I am done with it, both with Wikipedia and my freetime. I am still far away to know how things actually work here with a never ending list of rules and policies. So my dear friend, irrespective of whether you unblock me or not, let me tell you this IP is of an organisation with more than 5000 employees. So for their sake alone unblock the IP address atleast. Coming to my User ID, am afraid I'll not be continuing with anymore edits here as now I really feel Wiki articles are not neutral 'based' POV but more of its Editors 'biased' POV. Any administrator with good logical and reasoning skills over here can look into the User's profile (who reported me as Sock), his likes and dislikes and can then refer to those articles and found out themselves what hes upto. Let me ask one simple question to the Administrators here. "What does Wikipedia do if one of their editors (who's contributed immensely to Wiki) starts vandalizing (under the disguise of their popularity earned here) other articles based on his interests or should I say disinterests? Is that not "Vandalizing"?" If my edits of merely a few words of glorification is accused of SockPuppeting, then what would you term his (that user's) multiple pages of glorifying edits. I just pointed out him a few differences and discrepancies over some articles not being consistent across Wiki and here I am being accused of "Abusing Multiple Accounts". Thats a Joke. Really. I thought Wiki was different. Everyone over here can voice their views and opinions about things and people they desire. But I guess its run by a group of editors who I understand have contributed immensely but are somewhere indifferent of having neutral and unbiased views. I hope you sense and feel what I am trying to say. Finally to summarize, I request you to order an inquiry for my User account and find out that I am not the "Sock" and nowhere related to the user "Zia86Khan". I am and always will be Maneesh. Whether to unlock me or not, its now over to you buddy. Maneesh 12:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is definitely going somewhere else. I am actually the one to spot vandalism carried by prominent Wikipedian editors against few celebrities and hey just look what happened. That user editor claims me to be a "Sock". BTW whats a sock? Yes this was the first question I got in mind after reading it for the first time but then I've now finally found out Whats a sock. You got to believe this. I actually started editing on Wiki just 5 days back as my project gave me some freetime till now but I guess I am done with it, both with Wikipedia and my freetime. I am still far away to know how things actually work here with a never ending list of rules and policies. So my dear friend, irrespective of whether you unblock me or not, let me tell you this IP is of an organisation with more than 5000 employees. So for their sake alone unblock the IP address atleast. Coming to my User ID, am afraid I'll not be continuing with anymore edits here as now I really feel Wiki articles are not neutral 'based' POV but more of its Editors 'biased' POV. Any administrator with good logical and reasoning skills over here can look into the User's profile (who reported me as Sock), his likes and dislikes and can then refer to those articles and found out themselves what hes upto. Let me ask one simple question to the Administrators here. "What does Wikipedia do if one of their editors (who's contributed immensely to Wiki) starts vandalizing (under the disguise of their popularity earned here) other articles based on his interests or should I say disinterests? Is that not "Vandalizing"?" If my edits of merely a few words of glorification is accused of SockPuppeting, then what would you term his (that user's) multiple pages of glorifying edits. I just pointed out him a few differences and discrepancies over some articles not being consistent across Wiki and here I am being accused of "Abusing Multiple Accounts". Thats a Joke. Really. I thought Wiki was different. Everyone over here can voice their views and opinions about things and people they desire. But I guess its run by a group of editors who I understand have contributed immensely but are somewhere indifferent of having neutral and unbiased views. I hope you sense and feel what I am trying to say. Finally to summarize, I request you to order an inquiry for my User account and find out that I am not the "Sock" and nowhere related to the user "Zia86Khan". I am and always will be Maneesh. Whether to unlock me or not, its now over to you buddy. Maneesh 12:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}