User talk:MuZemike/Unprotected talk page

If you are here, then is it likely that you are an IP or otherwise not able to edit User talk:MuZemike because a few morons have ruined it for everybody and decided to harass me. Here are some ground rules:

1. Post on the bottom of the page and sign with four tildes ~~~~.
2. Maintain proper civility, and decorum, and I will guarantee to do the same in return.
3. If User talk:MuZemike is not semi-protected, then this page will be full-protected.
4. I reserve the right to remove, suppress, or outright delete any and all blatant vandalism by any means necessary.

WML request for deleted page: Mark M. Lowenthal

Moved to User talk:MuZemike#WML request for deleted page: Mark M. Lowenthal; you're autoconfirmed and should be able to edit on my actual talk page. –MuZemike 17:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Please,unblock Arnaiz1 and Virginal6

Moved to User talk:MuZemike#Please,unblock Arnaiz1 and Virginal6; you're autoconfirmed and should be able to edit on my actual talk page. –MuZemike 22:47, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

NAVCO Business Security Systems page deletion

Can you please take a look at my user page and see if the posted article is now suitable? Amiepeterson (talk) 02:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion Policy

Comment moved to User talk:MuZemike#Deletion Policies / Vanity Pages; poster should be able to edit on my main talk page. –MuZemike 05:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for unblocking me. I will uphold my promise not to vandalise and I'll help with anything you might need in the future. Thanks!Eiennotaku (talk) 02:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Eiennotaku —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eiennotaku (talk • contribs) 02:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

You said on the Charlie Anders page I should contact you by email. How do I contact u by email? Formerly 76.169.140.29 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC).

Wikipedia Discussion On Me(Kagome_85) PLEASE READ!!!!!!

Although I know you might delete this and refuse to reply to it given that another user has been deleting my posts claiming how I am not allowed to post since I'm banned, I think you should listen to me, given that a user is harassing me(the one that started the discussion on me). This is what I posted on the Wikipedia thread that was removed: Although I know that this account will be banned for "sockpuppetry" or "evasion of block" or whatever, I just want to point out have you thought to see if these accounts created to say how the account Kagome_85 should have a sitewide ban MIGHT be related to Moukity? Kagome_85 is my account, but these accounts created to say there should be a sitewide ban are not. If an IP trace was done you would find that this account and the accounts made to say there should be a sitewide ban put on me probably start with 142., but you would also see that the rest of the digits that follow my account and the ones that follow the accounts made to say there should be a sitewide ban put in place on me are different. I know you may say that any user that is guilty would say that, however, I am pointing that out since a.) I am not stupid enough to go on here saying you should put a sitewide ban on me by using a different account since I know you can trace it and b.) Why would I go make another account to report something I did on another account when I know that would just get me in trouble since I can get caught? and c.) Why would I go linking to a news article about me when I don't want people to know about it? I'm not looking for attention or anything like some people are.

I hope that you consider what I said since I felt I should point out the fact that Moukity could(and more than likely is) be behind these new accounts made to say that I should be banned from the site permanently. Anyway, feel free to ban this account as you probably will, but I'll be putting the retirement sign on it anyway since you can be guaranteed I won't be using this anymore. By the way, the only reason I found this post was that I went to check the Incidents Noticeboards for something on another topic that I was told about that has nothing to do with me, so you can't say that I had any knowledge of this thread because I never, if you looked at the date that this post was made you would see that. Please, I implore you, to do an investigation into the accounts that started this discussion on me, and see if they were made by Moukity (a.k.a. Blackmagic1234). If you see this, then you will know that he is at fault as well. Sango 42 (talk) 11:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Mario's Last Year episodes

When you block a Mario96 sock, it's a good idea to disable talk page editing also because they've learned that they can usually edit that page after an incomplete block. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree

Good decision on salting the David Bruce McMahan page, even though there is no good reason for the outright deletion of the page. We wouldn't want people to think Wikipedia is non-corruptible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.76.151.151 (talk) 05:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Laura Massey

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Laura Massey. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.Gregsteimel (talk) 09:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Unblocked

Ah, that feels better. Thanks. --208.76.104.144 (talk) 23:36, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Tetrafusion

I submitted a request for undeletion for Tetrafusion and was directed here. I would like to request an undeletion from you personally; you can read my case at the Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion page toward the bottom. Hope to hear from you soon. User: Msm041 —Preceding undated comment added 01:18, 2 November 2010 (UTC).

You will probably need to request a review of my AFD closure at deletion review instead. I will say right now that I felt the lone rationale for retention was completely refuted, and that a rough consensus for deletion was indeed formed. Also, the status of other articles has no bearing on this article. Perhaps they will also be nominated for deletion in the future, or perhaps reliable sources establishing notability may be found. –MuZemike 02:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC)