User talk:Neutrality

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

August 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Covered bridge may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

et al., ''Historic Spots in California'', Stanford University Press: 5th ed. 2002, p. 107.</ref>), including one at [[Knights Ferry, California|Knight's Ferry]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Knights Ferry
smith-rapids-covered-bridge-200271 Smith Rapids Covered Bridge], TravelWisconsin.com.</ref>)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Covered bridge may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''The Bridges of New Jersey: Portraits of Garden State Crossings'', Rutgers University Press, 2005), p. 92.</ref> Today, two covered bridges remain: [[Green Sergeant's Covered Bridge]] (19th century)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources at John Kasich

Greetings, I was wondering if it might be helpful when naming refs to include some other parameter (like the date of the article) along with the author name to help prevent duplication of ref names. We seem to be running into issues with duplication of ref names at John Kasich when the refs just include the author name. Thanks.CFredkin (talk) 17:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your 2015-08-20 edits to "Hillary Clinton email controversy"

@Neutrality: You ought to try your hand at doing a few edits to the "Hillary Clinton email controversy" article. . . . Perhaps you could rack-up a couple 100,000 more edits in your total edit count? (Ever consider working in your SandBox before publishing edits, in lieu of publishing every single little micro edit individually?)
It's OK with me if you remove this message. --- Professor JR (talk) 08:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits to this article. Your methodology was perfect as the changes needed were so complicated. I fully support your work. Cheers. Grahamboat (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Grahamboat! Neutrality^talk 17:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eric Holder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Al-Shabab

Hillary Clinton email controversy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New Yorker

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

requesting self revert

of your revert here: [1]. Note in particular that your edit summary said "absolutely no reason to take it out", even though I had just mentioned WP:BIAS in the talk discussion. As I'm sure you'll agree, WP:BIAS is in fact a reason. Additionally, per WP:EW, "This page in a nutshell: Don't use edits to fight with other editors – disagreements should be resolved through discussion." Thank you. Iran nuclear weapons 2 (talk) 22:28, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Political positions of Jeb Bush

Hi, due to an ArbCom matter I edited the abortion section to restore it to how it was before I edited it yesterday. Please feel free to edit the section however you think best. My apologies for inadvertently doing something I wasn't supposed to do. It just slipped my mind, and then when I realized, I immediately went to ArbCom for clarification.Anythingyouwant (talk) 01:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]