User talk:Niteshift36: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:20, 5 February 2010

Han Moo Do AMA

Corkscrew store photo

that would be incredibly cool —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothyapetty (talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Hannity

Greetings, Niteshift! I've asked an admin whom I respect greatly to weigh in on the whole Sean Hannity/waterboarding/sock puppet issue. Though he and I have collaborated on several articles in the past, we come from very distinct worldviews. As a self-described conservative Christian, he's actually probably more inclined to side with you, although I trust him completely to strive for a neutral point of view. (Not saying you don't... but again, I've worked with him many times.) Mainly, I'm hoping he can get to the bottom of the issue of sockpuppets and SPA's thwarting our efforts at consensus building. Looking forward to working with him, and you! -- JeffBillman (talk) 23:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't think that I've supported the inclusion of the waterboarding statement because I want to see criticism of him for the sake of criticism — I believe that it's better included as an example of his political views on a touchy subject. And your userboxes — see mine if you've not already looked. I'm not suspecting you of being a staffer working with a hidden POV :-) Nyttend (talk) 13:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After giving the matter quite a bit of thought, I decided I agree with you on the Hal Turner issue. It's just not notable to an article on Sean Hannity. Indeed, about all that is notable about Hannity's days at WABC is that which already appears in the article-- and I say that as a fan of Hannity since shortly before his leaving WGST. (Yes, really! A non-traditional Libertarian who is a fan of a faithful Catholic conservative. Whodda thunk it? ;-) ) What worries me, though, is how the article has been redacted to the point that it does now seem to be askew of NPOV. And although the POV I think it now represents is not my own, that does not make it any more worrisome to me than if it had taken a POV that more closely matches my own. Cheers! -- JeffBillman (talk) 00:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Gang

I noticed that you been editing the Gang article . I just created a Portal (Portal:Gang) I need your help. If you have time, Can you help add some content to my portal. I would appreciate it, Thanks.--Zink Dawg -- 06:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Rahm has created a new account and is editing under User_talk:See-Threepio. So far, doesn't seem to be especially disruptive, although MOS violations persist. I'll take a closer gander at his recent edits and go from there. Anyway, FYI. --EEMIV (talk) 19:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

South Florida Wikipedia editors Meetup

I proposed a new meeting day, time and place here [1] under the section "New Suggestion" NancyHeise ^talk 07:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prod on David M. Malone

Drmies has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Afd

The nom had obvious bad faith. Removing a good ref. with a misguiding edit summary like that, as well as User:Cirt being on my watchlist (he has been having a go at the nom for the removal of valid refs and pov'ing), he had no chance. Not to mention I'm sure he didn't expect people to support a keep.

That article had around 30 refs at a time, look out for User:Kai Tatsu, I know he put some of the rubbish refs in there.Ren ✉ 05:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC) [reply]

List of New Religious Movements- common sense

Thank you for your comments on my talk page. It is nice to know that I am not alone in my take on the common sense thing. Regarding the link you sent, what is that? Is that part of Wikipedia? There is so much going on on Wikipedia it just makes my head spin. How can anyone keep up with it?!Elmmapleoakpine (talk) 00:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC) BTW. Thank you for your service to our country! Elmmapleoakpine (talk) 00:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Ah! Okay. Now I understand. Thank you.Elmmapleoakpine (talk) 00:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

~~Can you please remove the throw anyone under the bus comment, please? Or move it to the talk page? I would really appreciate it.~~ Ikip 19:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you want it removed, but I did. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) I think your input is very valuable, and I would like to see your suggestions some more. Ikip 19:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

International Sport Combat Federation

Hey there Niteshift! I've been in touch with Steve Fossum, the president of the ICSF, and we've been trying to work on getting the article up to notability standards. He sent me the following, and while it needs work, I'm wondering if the references he's provided satisfy your interpretation of the notability guidelines. Let me know what you think whenever you get a chance. Thanks in advance ocee^{Conas tá tú?} 21:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

International Sport Combat Federation - ISCF

The International Sport Combat Federation (ISCF) is an international sanctioning body regulating mixed martial arts and submission grappling and is based out of Newcastle, California, USA. http://www.iscfmma.com/ISCFLogoSMWH.jpg

WHAT IS THE ISCF? The ISCF was the first ever Sanctioning Body for the Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) created in 1999. Other than the annual ISCF Amateur World Classic (The Golden Gloves of MMA) The ISCF does not Promote events and is NOT a Promotional Company. The ISCF is a "Sanctioning Body" for Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) events just like other sanctioning bodies for fight sports (Kickboxing: IKF, ISKA, WKA, USKBA etc. - Boxing: WBC, IBF, WBC etc.).

SANCTIONING When the ISCF is called upon to SANCTION an event, the name of the event does not change. In fact, very little does change. The ISCF works with each Promoter and or Promotional Company individually. The ISCF assigns and approves all event officials that have been trained and certified as ISCF Officials.

RULES The ISCF is sometimes asked to follow the rules and requirements of a jurisdictions Athletic Commission of the region the event is promoted in. If so, some ISCF Rules and Regulations may vary to meet the requirements of the State or jurisdiction of the event.

The ISCF Mission For Mixed Martial Arts... "Safety, Credibility, Fairness, Recognition, Support & Unification of Mixed Martial Arts Around The World"

"The goal of the International Sport Combat Federation is to regulate safe and fair rules and regulations and help provide exposure and opportunities for local, regional, national and international competition among amateur and professional mixed martial arts fighters, trainers, promoters and officials. We will, through adherence to and enforcement of these rules and regulations, strive to make competitive mixed martial arts fighting a safe and fair sport as we continue to help bring exposure to and enhance the present as well as the future of the sport we serve, Mixed Martial Arts." Steve Fossum, President International Sport Combat Federation

___________________________________

References Books and articles

http://www.cagepotato.com/2008/02/19/fight-magazine-exclusive-smoker

http://newsblaze.com/story/20090908155021zmil.nb/topstory.html

http://eon.businesswire.com/portal/site/eon/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20070323105175&newsLang=en

http://worldextremefighter.com/2009/11/24/mma-scoring-system-needs-change/

http://www.fullcontactmartialarts.org/mma-mixed-martial-arts.html

http://www.extremeprosports.com/full_contact_fighting/amateur_grappling_venues.html

http://www.search.com/reference/International_Sport_Combat_Federation

http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2005_06/pdf/sb224.pdf

http://www.yourinnerdragon.com/mixed-martial-arts-mma.html

http://www.prweb.com/releases/seemeactive/fightsports/prweb3156014.htm

http://www.whispy.com/martial-arts-resources.html

http://tn.gov/commerce/athletic/index.shtml

http://www.camplejeuneglobe.com/articles/2007/12/06/sports/base/onbase02.txt

Note - the ISCF is also the first and largest sanctioning body in the world ocee^{Conas tá tú?} 21:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miami meetup

Are we meeting tomorrow? We need to decide what time and where exactly. Please offer comments at the meetup page here [2]. NancyHeise ^talk 02:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiwings

		Wikiwings
		For extraordinary contributions to Aircraft in fiction, thus improving hundreds of aircraft type articles along the way! - Ahunt (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Closing of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Stilwell

Please explain the rationale of withdrawing this AfD after 7 days of debate and before an administrator can close it.--Oakshade (talk) 20:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 114: / Line 114: @@
 |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For extraordinary contributions to [[Aircraft in fiction]], thus improving hundreds of aircraft type articles along the way! - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 15:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 |}
+==Closing of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Stilwell]]==
+Please explain the rationale of withdrawing this AfD after 7 days of debate and before an administrator can close it.--[[User:Oakshade|Oakshade]] ([[User talk:Oakshade|talk]]) 20:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)