User talk:Onel5969: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:09, 8 January 2021

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43

Edit Count

edit count

Wiki mark-up link

Hi! You might find these handy:

Simple guide to Wikipedia mark-up
- Advanced guide to Wiki mark-up

Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 22:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Links for new editors

If you're leaving a question regarding an article you're attempting to get onto Wikipedia, here are some links you might find helpful:

Happy New Year, Onel5969!

Happy New Year!

Onel5969,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010^Talk 00:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Right back at you, Davey2010, keep up the good work. And may your 2021 be happy, healthy, and prosperous. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Onel5969, Many thanks and you keep up the fantastic work up too!, Many thanks, Lets hope 2021 will be a much better year for us all!, Take care and stay safe mate, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 00:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

about GEO

We can expand this article by referring to the German wiki.--Htmlzycq (talk) 16:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Htmlzycq, hi and Happy New Year. Not sure what you're talking about... please provide a link. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year! Gene Expression Omnibus, in the wikidata d:Q17321881.--Htmlzycq (talk) 16:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Htmlzycq, thanks. I agree it can be expanded, although there isn't much more in the German article. But until it is, I think the redirect is appropriate. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 hi, firstly i included 2 sources on that page what else do you want? Secondly what do you mean by "what constitutes notability on WP"? AleksiB 1945 (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Kimberly Ritchie

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Kimberly Ritchie, which you proposed for deletion. Hi there! I'm a marine biologist and even though the page wasn't descriptive enough, Kimberly Ritchie's name is associated with coral microbiomes and I think an article on her would be beneficial to readers. If the author can expand on what makes her research significant, having this wiki page will be a useful link to the pages on coral holobionts and microbiomes. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Mochamedusae (talk) 18:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tweiulfse

Regarding you revert in this edit.

That page was created by a new user who moved the page UP10TION discography to Tweiulfse because they were trying to move UP10TIon discography to UP10TION discography. I know that the page history shows that it was created by an experienced editor but it is clearly a test page created by a new user. Apologies if my explanation didn't make any sense. EN-Jungwon 15:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon, hi. When you put a CSD tag on a redirect, it has to have a clear reason why. And it needs to fall under one of the three categories at WP:RCSD, which this clearly didn't. And as a redirect, doesn't qualify for a prod. At best, it should go through the RfD process. The redirect was created by Ss112, who I can not point to a single bad redirect they've created. That being said, there does not appear to be a mention of Tweiulfse on the target page. I've pinged SS112 to see if there should be a mention at the discography. If not, then it should probably go through RfD.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diriliş: Ertuğrul (season 5)

Hi, I noticed you added a copyvio-revdel tag to my article, does that mean that my article can get deleted? Limorina (talk) 14:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Limorina, hi. WP takes copyright violations very seriously. So be careful in the future, as if you continue to do this, you could get blocked from editing. But in this instance, no, your article will not be deleted. I've removed the part which was a copyright violation, and asked an admin to do what is known as a "revdel", where they remove the offending edits from history so no one can see them. So please be careful. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Al-Saadoun

- Hi , please wait don't delete Omar Al-Saadoun, he was famous person in Iraq and Icon for Iraqi protesters in Nassiriyah ,,,Hamaredha (talk) 15:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PE With Joe Article

Hi. I saw you just converted the PE With Joe article to a redirect due to lack of notability. I disagree with this. While I agree the article didn't have sufficent coverage currently, the topic certainly has reliable, third party sources. Reputable sources such as the Independent, The Evening Standard, the BBC, the Telegraph, the Financial Times and Sky Sports have covered the topic. Therefore, I think the article should be reverted back to an article and tweaked to include these reliable sources. Have a nice day :)! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squid45 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian Institute for Nature Research

Have you looked at how many references there are to Norwegian Institute for Nature Research ? Why misled the public with link to article that has nothing to do with this subject ? There are many similar articles: Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Norwegian Institute for Air Research Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research Norwegian Institute for Crop Research Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies Norwegian Institute for Social Research Norwegian Institute for Strategic Studies Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research Norwegian Institute for Water Research to name just a few ... Please provide more arguments for your action. Thanks ! User:Abune (talk) 14:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC) P.S. Close to 4000 (3783) publications !!! many has been cited in Wikipedia if you look at links !!! according to https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Norwegian_Institute_for_Nature_Research "The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) is Norway’s leading institution for applied ecological research, with expertise on the genetic, population, species, ecosystem and landscape level, in terrestrial, freshwater and coastal marine environments. NINA addresses a wide variety of interdisciplinary issues involving both ecologists and social scientists, and plays an important role in European and other international research cooperation." according to https://www.fondationsegre.org/norwegian-institute-for-nature-research/ User:Abune (talk) 14:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abune, the issue was sourcing and no indication of notability. There were zero reliable references from independent sources.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see... What about these two : https://www.fondationsegre.org/norwegian-institute-for-nature-research/

https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Norwegian_Institute_for_Nature_Research ? will you consider that sufficient ? User:Abune (talk) 16:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abune, the guidelines are at WP:GNG, and WP:ORGDEPTH. In a nutshell, you need several in-depth references from independent sources to show notability. In addition, they should be from outside the local geographic area. The two sources you have above, are not in-depth, one is a simple listing, and the other one is little more than a blurb. They show the organization exists, but they do not show it is notable. Those other organizations are of dubious notability as well, and that is considered an "other stuff exists" argument, see WP:OSE. Hope this helps.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see ... Simple Google search produced more than 140 references in various independent sources and majority NOT from Norway. It will take some time for me to work through this list to find most appropriate. I personally have no doubt that this is one of the major organizations in it field (e.g. Pallas's cat‎, Asiatic cheetah ).

Once I update list of references to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:ORGDEPTH I'm going to restore this article. Will take a day, two or entire week depending on how busy I'm in "real life". Take care ! User:Abune (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abune, if you want, I can move it into draftspace, so you can take your time to work on it.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for offering. Either way works for me ! I’m here since 2006 or so ... User:Abune (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Ibero-American Cultural Centre

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Ibero-American Cultural Centre, which you proposed for deletion. There are now more reliable references. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Miguel913 (talk) 18:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Star Gold

I wished to discuss with you about the edits you made to Star Gold. I have reverted them and wish to discuss this minute conflict with you. I have made this article based on the article of its sister-channel: Star Bharat. I have used similar content, and would like to state that it is one of the most prominent channels in India at present.

I have also made sufficient edits to make sure that it isn't promotional. So please view the article and kindly reply.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 04:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the review!

Once again, Thanks a lot Sir for your utmost generosity. These flowers are a small return to give you for my gratitude. Thanks a million for giving your review on the article Kaatelal & Sons.--Aleyamma38 (talk) 04:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia Barclay

Heyup

I'm trying to work out what Sofia Barclay would have to do to become notable. From my view, she's had several major roles (including as Selina in the BBC drama Defending the Guilty, who is a pivotal role) and has a major role in the upcoming Text for You. That would pass NACTOR, surely? The role of Adela Zal in NYPD Blue would add to that.

Stui (talk) 15:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stui, being in 3 episodes of a television series is not a truly significant role. And a minor role in a TV film isn't really that significant either. If she has one of the leads in the upcoming film, which it doesn't look like she does, a case MIGHT be made for passing WP:NACTOR, but it would be borderline at best. And only after that upcoming film is released. I do agree with you that the redirect made no sense, since she's not mentioned in the target article. Is she the granddaughter of those two? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She is the granddaughter of David Barclay, although I'm really not sure who her parents are. I'm not sure why the redirect was there, either, but it looks like the person who created the page did so as a sort of "these are people linked so I'm making the page in case they're notable at some point" hedge.

The TV show is 6 eps long (admittedly half as long as Fawlty Towers) and I believe it has been recommissioned (although Covid is making it hard to do).

Ultimately, I think she's getting somewhere in the acting world, and the presence of the original page for three years clearly hasn't done any harm. It seemed prudent to fill it out with actual information rather than having an irrelevant redirect.

Stui (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 147: / Line 147: @@
 [[User:Stui|Stui]] ([[User talk:Stui|talk]]) 15:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 :{{u|Stui}}, being in 3 episodes of a television series is not a truly significant role.  And a minor role in a TV film isn't really that significant either.  If she has one of the leads in the upcoming film, which it doesn't look like she does, a case MIGHT be made for passing [[WP:NACTOR]], but it would be borderline at best.  And only after that upcoming film is released.  I do agree with you that the redirect made no sense, since she's not mentioned in the target article.  Is she the granddaughter of those two? [[User:onel5969|'''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 15:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
+She is the granddaughter of David Barclay, although I'm really not sure who her parents are. I'm not sure why the redirect was there, either, but it looks like the person who created the page did so as a sort of "these are people linked so I'm making the page in case they're notable at some point" hedge.
+The TV show is 6 eps long (admittedly half as long as Fawlty Towers) and I believe it has been recommissioned (although Covid is making it hard to do).
+Ultimately, I think she's getting somewhere in the acting world, and the presence of the original page for three years clearly hasn't done any harm. It seemed prudent to fill it out with actual information rather than having an irrelevant redirect.
+[[User:Stui|Stui]] ([[User talk:Stui|talk]]) 16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)