User talk:Orartu

Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article. Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article. This user constantly erases the other versions of the name of the city Kars in other languages (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars, Azerbaijani: Qars, Georgian: ყარსი Kars, Kurdish: Qers, Russian: Карс Kars) , and only lets the Armenian version of the name to stay (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars). Unfortunately this user's ethnocentric POV pushing by ignoring the history of the city, after the Armenian era, is still allowed to stay. He even defends it in the city article talk page. I think the problem is solved.It is interesting,this city is in Turkey, and there is not its name in Turkish version.--Orartu (talk) 14:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Your usertalkpage cannot be deleted Your usertalkpage cannot be deleted, but you have blanked it. If you're having an issue, see WP:DR first, followed by WP:ANI (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:06, 15 November 2011 (UTC) Hello there. Thanks for taking the time to clarify on my concerns regarding the Azarbaijani Kurds. Your clarification was very elaborate and well explained. However, I still think that the Azarbaijani Kurds are notable enough to have an article of their own in Wikipedia. As you have correctly pointed out, the content might not be accurate. But we can always edit it to fit in with Wikipedia standards and guidelines. At any rate, the AfD decision is already there. Once again, thank you. Your time and efforts are greatly appreciated. Pmresource (talk) 20:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC) You're welcome.Thanks for your neutral comments in [1],I think your explanation changed the result,but I am sure you were neutral but User:علی ویکی and User:Alborz Fallah who intentionally entered false materials, were not.Discussion about Iranian and Azerbaijani related articles with neutral and positive users like you are welcomed.But now I am involved in discussion here [2] with same users and their group, that would be of your kindness if you involve in this discussion as a neutral one too.I hope by involving neutral users like you in Iranian and Azerbaijani-related articles, the poisoned atmosphere around these articles be changed.With Respect--Orartu (talk) 07:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC) email Mumken olsa mana bir email gondarin Mardetanha talk 19:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Sizin email adresizi bilmiram.--Orartu (talk) 19:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Sayfam da yazdim Mardetanha talk 20:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC) I didn't receive any massage.--Orartu (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Blocked + ArbCom Notification You have been blocked for one month from editing for serious and repeated violations of WP:BATTLE ([3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]), WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL ([11][12][13][14][15]), WP:DISRUPT and WP:EW ([16][17]) - your disruptive behavior has escalated in recent days, despite a previous block and the numerous warnings by the administrators. Therefore, I'm also placing you under AA ArbCom sanctions. Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2, any editor who edits articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility may be placed under several editing restrictions, by notice on that editor's talk page. This notice is to inform you that based on your edits, you are hereby placed under the following restrictions: Revert limitation (formerly known as revert parole). You are limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism, and are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. Supervised editing (formerly known as probation). You may be banned by any administrator from editing any or all articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area should you fail to maintain a reasonable degree of civility in your interactions with one another concerning disputes which may arise. Civility supervision (formerly known as civility parole). If you make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, then you may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for repeat transgressions. Enforcement: Violations of limitations, supervision, or bans imposed by the remedies in this case may be enforced by brief blocks of up to a week in the event of repeat violations. After 5 blocks the maximum block period shall increase to one year. Khoikhoi 01:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC)