User talk:SPECIFICO

"Vulture"

What's the point of all your nit-picking on Talk:Paul Singer? We seem to agree in opposing the removal of "vulture" from the article. Do you just like to quarrel? J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 19:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi no intention to offend you I was just responding to the tone I understood by "funny" which I think accurately reflects the fact that the entire thread is somewhat about nits and beyond the immediate edit issue. Thanks for the note. SPECIFICO talk 20:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Topic ban

I believe you are breaking your topic ban by writing on the Ayn Rand page: "She became friends with journalist Henry Hazlitt and his wife, and Hazlitt introduced her to the Austrian School economist Ludwig von Mises. Despite her philosophical differences with them, Rand strongly endorsed the writings of both men throughout her career." Reissgo (talk) 11:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Nope. Don't push your luck. SPECIFICO talk 12:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

"Don't push your luck"? Are you threatening me?

"The following sanction now applies to you: You are topic-banned from everything and everyone related to the Austrian School of economics, in addition to your previous topic ban covering the Ludwig von Mises Institute and persons related to it."... anyone with more than a passing interest in Austrian economics will soon discover that there is a strong link with Ayn Rand. Are you telling me that you didn't know there was such a link? Reissgo (talk) 14:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Do not post on this page again. SPECIFICO talk 14:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Reissgo has a point, if you agree to not post on the Ayn Rand page again would that settle it? Darkstar1st (talk) 16:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

It is just about conceivable that SPECIFICO did not know about the connection, so if he does not post again I will not take it further. Reissgo (talk) 16:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

You have a point there as well and the response to you pointing out the infraction was a bit harsh/unlucky. Darkstar1st (talk) 17:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement Sanctions Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Template:Z33