User talk:Sailor Haumea

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of oldest living people, you may be blocked from editing. This also goes for any other account or IP address you use. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 04:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

A) You're the one vandalizing Wikipedia by violating the core principles of the encyclopedia.

B) Are you accusing me of sockpuppetry without evidence? --Sailor Haumea (talk) 00:46, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

For someone who is apparently new to Wikipedia you seem to have a considerable knowledge of terms such as sockpuppetry. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 03:56, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

I've used Wikipedia before using an IP. I'm not new...--Sailor Haumea (talk) 04:58, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shigechiyo Izumi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |death_date = February 21, 1986 (aged 109/120 years, 237 days

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at List of oldest living people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ravensfire (talk) 23:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions warning

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Longevity, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.