User talk:TDC: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
TDC (talk | contribs)
→‎"plastic key": depleted uranium
Line 85: Line 85:


::: I figured. I nominated the article for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Improvement_Drive#Iran-Iraq_War_.281_vote.2C_stays_until_July_28.29 the Article improvement Drive] if you want to weigh in on it. [[User:TDC|Torturous Devastating Cudgel]] 14:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
::: I figured. I nominated the article for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Improvement_Drive#Iran-Iraq_War_.281_vote.2C_stays_until_July_28.29 the Article improvement Drive] if you want to weigh in on it. [[User:TDC|Torturous Devastating Cudgel]] 14:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

== [[Depleted uranium]] ==
Yes, it is a violation of his ArbCom ban, and I´ve blocked him for it. [[User:Physchim62|Physchim62]] [[User talk:Physchim62|(talk)]] 15:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:46, 24 July 2006

User_talk:TDC/Archive_1 User_talk:TDC/Archive_2 user_talk:TDC/Archive_3 user_talk:TDC/Archive_4 user_talk:TDC/Archive_5

Tuesday May 14th 01:20

You need to take the info posted to the above link to ensure enforcement of the ban.--MONGO 03:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 12:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

You have been very helpful with the Robeson article. You seem very knowledgable on this subject. Would you care to get involved in a dispute in the Stalin entry on the death toll associated with him?--JohnFlaherty 16:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion. I've just asked Essjay for help. Should be sorted out in a couple of minutes. --Srikeit (Talk | Email) 20:41, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikstalking

Please stop stalking my edits TDC. I really would prefer not to hear from you again if possible. I especially don't want to see your phony charges of harrassment on my talk page anymore. Feel free to delete this comment, but please leave me the fuck alone after that. Thanks, and have a nice day.--csloat 20:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No need for the potty mouth. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 20:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
TDC what the fuck did that conversation have to do with you? You are the one stalking. I also have his talk page on my watch list, as well as Ron's, and that conversation had to do with edits I had participated in! For fuck's sake, there is no reason I should have to explain this to you; the one thing I know for sure is that that conversation had nothing to do with you. For the last time, please stop stalking me. I do not trust you at all TDC; I have caught you lying numerous times in the past, and you have made numerous edits (such as these) whose only purpose seems to be to launch personal attacks on me. For the last time, LEAVE ME ALONE.--csloat 20:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Listen, I have observed that you have a nasty habit of singling out users and following them around from page to page. Some people might consider that rude and annoying, and the conversation between Ron and 172 had nothing to do with you, or me, but I never chimed into it. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 21:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TDC, I asked you to leave me alone. Now you are "warning" me on my talk page. Warning me about what? Get lost. Really. I am not interested in your personal attacks, your false charges of stalking, nor your trolling. Leave me alone!--csloat 14:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am sending this message to serious contributors who may be interested in articles related to U.S. politics. I believe I am receiving an unreasonable response-- and at times insulting and rude-- from the editors of Norm Coleman article, who refuse to remove a section that may offer some interesting trivia for Wikipeidia users, but is irrelevant to people interested in reading an encyclopedia article on a member of U.S. Senate. If you have time, please take a look at the article. Regards. 172 | Talk 03:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just got back from vacation and am a little swamped, but I will try and look in on it later in the week. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 14:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World's Ninth Wonder

Hello, I noticed your comment on A People's History and nearly fell from the chair. This is the very first constructive, non-hostile comment I have ever seen you write. Maybe it was that vacation. Ta bueno.

re: (edit summary)

  • generic intensifier [[1]

Skywriter 15:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


FYI: I am not a pimp

User_talk:Travb/Archive_5#Fleetwood_Mack

I have had you tell better jokes before, you are losing your touch man.

PS: Please stop deleting large portions of text which I added. This really gets me mad when wikiusers do this, no matter what they delete, and no matter what their POV. I was in the middle of chastizing you for this a few days ago, hit send, and realized that I had got booted, yet again.

I just told someone (see my archive 6, last message) how I feel guilty about bringing up all your 3RR's, because now I have a history that people can use against me too. It really sucks having your history dog you like that, and have other people bring it up. Sorry man.

The irony of it all, is that I was indefinetly booted, and user:Duk, the copyright police dude, who fought on your side when you used to use copyright as a weapon on WSI unbooted me. Can you believe this? He is really a forgiving guy. Travb (talk) 04:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Yes, I hate to say that the ends justify the means, but that is sort of my position in a way. I'll be a good boy and be sickeningly perfect now. Hope all is going good on your end! Keep up the good work.--MONGO 21:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The ends justifying the means ... that was the subject of a 6 hour debate while I was on my trip to Glacier. Needless to say, this time it does. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 00:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CfD

Hope you've had a good vacation. Unless you're still swamped, I'll apprecaite your feedback on this CfD listing. [2] Thanks. 172 | Talk 03:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

National Lawyers Guild

Hi TDC, you've been reported for a 3RR violation, and a violation of your revert parole, and have been blocked for 24 hours. Note that, although the versions were different each time, you kept adding one key passage, and reverts do not have to be to the same version. When you return, please try to reach a compromise on the talk page. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 05:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would protest, but would it so any good? Torturous Devastating Cudgel 12:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Norm Coleman

Thanks for the reply. The Coleman page is now stable again, along with a related dispute on Marty Meehan. I was trying to get this paragraph removed [3] (pretty irrelevant, right), and I was ultimately sucessful, which surprised me. Since trying to NPOV Conrad Burns, I hadn't been having too much luck on articles on Congressmen. 172 | Talk 20:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

123

I don't think you have ever been laid, that is probably why you are on this gay computer all day, every day.

could be, but I dont discuss my personal life on Wikipedia. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 16:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"plastic key"

Actually, we use keyless entry systems :)--Zereshk 02:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I propose a truce and hope we canboth stop acting like ass holes; agreed? Torturous Devastating Cudgel 03:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed and well received. About the keyless entry thing, I was just trying to be funny :)--Zereshk 03:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I figured. I nominated the article for the Article improvement Drive if you want to weigh in on it. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 14:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is a violation of his ArbCom ban, and I´ve blocked him for it. Physchim62 (talk) 15:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]