User talk:TrangaBellam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs) at 19:04, 7 March 2023 (→‎AE result: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives:
Talk, 2021, 2022, list

Pr.

To Read

Let's start over

I ask you to revert your changes to the state before your edits. Let's talk calmly on the talk page of the article about possible changes. I don't consider all the changes made by you as bad. But you ignored the ongoing discussion, where we were moving towards a compromise on some points. Let's take WP:CUPOFTEA and discuss them calmly. Please WP:Assume good faith, I will also do my best. Marcelus (talk) 19:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Marcelus (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is TrangaBellam. Thank you.

Damn - If I had made a program choose from a list of 500 diffs and attribute violations of wiki-policies at random, it would have come up with something better. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Polish-Jewish related topics

Hi @TrangaBellam. I hope this is within the scope of permitted comments due to current AE discussions, and I have no horse in this race except for the high quality of related articles, so just sending a note that I appreciate your work in these difficult topics. Although my involvement is filtered primarily through the lens of art history (visual cultures of Stalinist Poland and in its aftermath, to be more specific), I am very aware of the historiographical challenges that come with the territory. Ppt91talk 20:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vikram Sampath

Hi TrangaBellam, I've found many of the review quotations in the "Works and reception" section were inaccurately used; I've checked sources where possible and corrected many of these poorly done quotations but it's possible some inaccuracies may remain, and it may be wise to check other citations too. Gushing praise in reviews seems to frequently be a sign of this problem. I've also noted a couple of missing citations with [citation needed] tags. Good luck with the article. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AE result

This is to let you know that I've closed the AE request about you. Of the evidence that related to you, some showed a pattern of edit warring and an unnecessarily combative approach to talk page discussions. While this does not rise to the level of requiring a formal sanction, I will be logging a warning as a record that this conduct has been discussed. My hope is that that is the end of the matter, but note that similar conduct comes to admins' attention in the future, it is very likely to result in a formal sanction. As a logged warning, this is appealable in accordance with the appeal procedure. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]