User talk:VQuakr: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎WP:NPA: new section
Tag: Reverted
Tags: Reverted contentious topics alert
Line 54: Line 54:


Please do not make personal attacks, as you did at the following diffs.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:VQuakr&diff=prev&oldid=1061820653][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adoring_nanny&diff=prev&oldid=1061808319] Personal attacks in edit summaries are particularly troublesome as they cannot be changed. Thank you. See [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:ASPERSIONS]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fermi_paradox&diff=prev&oldid=1061634712][[User:Adoring nanny|Adoring nanny]] ([[User talk:Adoring nanny|talk]]) 15:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Please do not make personal attacks, as you did at the following diffs.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:VQuakr&diff=prev&oldid=1061820653][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adoring_nanny&diff=prev&oldid=1061808319] Personal attacks in edit summaries are particularly troublesome as they cannot be changed. Thank you. See [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:ASPERSIONS]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fermi_paradox&diff=prev&oldid=1061634712][[User:Adoring nanny|Adoring nanny]] ([[User talk:Adoring nanny|talk]]) 15:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

== Discretionary sanctions / arbcom sanctions alert ==

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[COVID-19|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Adoring nanny|Adoring nanny]] ([[User talk:Adoring nanny|talk]]) 19:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:50, 24 December 2021


ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VQuakr,

Just a reminder, please post a talk page notice to the page creator when you tag a page for any type of deletion. You are using Twinkle but perhaps you need to change your Preferences so that "Notify page creator" box is checked along with ALL types of CSD criteria. I think the default is that only boxes for the most used criteria, like A7 and G11, are checked. With CSD G4, you should be able to leave a link to the AFD discussion so the page creator can understand why the article they created has been deleted.

Thank you for all of the work you do and for spotting these deleted article recreations. Liz Read! Talk! 00:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: thank you for the reminder! I had consciously elected not to warn the poster since G4 isn't a creator-fixable problem and they had just received a PROD notification, but I see that practice is not longer encouraged per WP:CSD so I can avoid repeating it. Thanks again! VQuakr (talk) 01:08, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you explain (in the article talk) the reason for your revert? 85.193.252.19 (talk) 20:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on talk, though I think the edit summary was pretty self-explanatory. VQuakr (talk) 02:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your (reverted) removal of talk page discussion.

I have dropped you an invite on the page to invite you to comment. Friendly regards, Springnuts (talk) 15:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make personal attacks, as you did at the following diffs.[1][2] Personal attacks in edit summaries are particularly troublesome as they cannot be changed. Thank you. See WP:NPA and WP:ASPERSIONS. [3]Adoring nanny (talk) 15:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions / arbcom sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Adoring nanny (talk) 19:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]