User talk:Violetriga: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:57, 6 February 2006

Talk to me...
Recent archive Add comment	My view of this talk page I will usually reply here, not on your talk page Comments will not be edited except to reformat them to a nice thread format if it looks untidy Obvious spam will be deleted

Re: Anon blocks

Yes, I acknowledge I made a mistake on that block. I did not realize it was a widely shared IP. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 14:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That ip (217.33.74.20) is a good example of why we need the ability to block unregistered users from an ip but allow registered ones. The unregistered contributions for an entire month previous to now were vandalism except for a handful of beneficial edits. --Syrthiss 13:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I very much agree. violet/riga (t) 13:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your boss is a sock puppetier?

Hi Violet,

I don't know if you're aware of this claim at VinnyCee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).

I am a Violetriga's boss.

Please forward me any screw-ups that user:Violetriga may have caused.

Thank you.

Vinny seems to be/have a sock 24.11.91.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), or see Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser#Police State possible sock puppetry.

I guess you have to laugh? Not always easy sometimes. Regards, Ben Aveling 07:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - well spotted. At least he's not been a very prolific editor, having only made a few contributions. I've reverted the user page and will try and keep my eye on it. Thanks, violet/riga (t) 11:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

QI Series 2 Christmas Special

Hi! Just in case you miss it on your watchlist, I've added a rough outline of the rest of this episode over at Talk:List_of_episodes_of_QI/detailed. As I said there, I wasn't sure exactly what info was relevant, but I've tried my best! If you need any additional info (I'll add points later), please ask and I'll watch that part of the episode again. Once it's done, I'm sure we can tidy it up to bring it to article standard! --Lox (t,c) 18:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration

A request for arbitration where you have been listed as a party has been opened by Raul654 (per Jimbo Wales). Please see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pedophilia userbox wheel war, as well as provide evidence at /Evidence and comment on proposals at /Workshop. —Locke Cole • t • c 13:57, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 Hi! Just in case you miss it on your watchlist, I've added a rough outline of the rest of this episode over at [[Talk:List_of_episodes_of_QI/detailed]]. As I said there, I wasn't sure exactly what info was relevant, but I've tried my best! If you need any additional info (I'll add points later), please ask and I'll watch that part of the episode again. Once it's done, I'm sure we can tidy it up to bring it to article standard! --[[User:Lox|Lox]] ([[User talk:Lox|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Lox|c]]) 18:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
+==Arbitration==
+A [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration|request for arbitration]] where you have been listed as a party has been opened by [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] (per [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]]). Please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pedophilia userbox wheel war]], as well as provide evidence at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pedophilia userbox wheel war/Evidence|/Evidence]] and comment on proposals at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pedophilia userbox wheel war/Workshop|/Workshop]]. —[[User:Locke Cole|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole|c]] 13:57, 6 February 2006 (UTC)