User talk:WarKosign/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 19: Line 19:
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Operation Protective Edge]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Operation Protective Edge]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->
:Also, please note that due to active arbitration remedies this article only allows [[WP:1RR|one revert]] per 24 hours. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> [[User:Mike V|<font color="#151B54">'''Mike V'''</font>]] • [[User_talk:Mike V|<font color="#C16C16">'''Talk'''</font>]]</span> 14:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
:Also, please note that due to active arbitration remedies this article only allows [[WP:1RR|one revert]] per 24 hours. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> [[User:Mike V|<font color="#151B54">'''Mike V'''</font>]] • [[User_talk:Mike V|<font color="#C16C16">'''Talk'''</font>]]</span> 14:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Please review my edit history. I attempted several times to find a compromise, made several different edits, asked [[User:Johorean_Boy|Johorean_Boy]] to use the talk page - and he ignored all my attempts and kept adding disinformation over and over again. He is the one that should be blocked.[[User:WarKosign|WarKosign]] ([[User talk:WarKosign#top|talk]]) 14:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|reason=Please review my edit history. I attempted several times to find a compromise, made several different edits, asked [[User:Johorean_Boy|Johorean_Boy]] to use the talk page - and he ignored all my attempts and kept adding disinformation over and over again. He is the one that should be blocked.[[User:WarKosign|WarKosign]] ([[User talk:WarKosign#top|talk]]) 14:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)|decline=I reviewed your edit history. You were, indeed, [[WP:EDITWAR|edit warring]] to ensure your favored version of the article remained in place. Instead, you should have kept discussing it on the article talk page until consensus was developed. --[[User:Jpgordon|--jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 15:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 15:26, 21 July 2014

Welcome!

Hello, WarKosign, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 09:47, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing content

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Operation_Protective_Edge, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Johorean Boy (talk) 14:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block Notice

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Operation Protective Edge. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Also, please note that due to active arbitration remedies this article only allows one revert per 24 hours. Mike VTalk 14:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WarKosign (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please review my edit history. I attempted several times to find a compromise, made several different edits, asked Johorean_Boy to use the talk page - and he ignored all my attempts and kept adding disinformation over and over again. He is the one that should be blocked.WarKosign (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I reviewed your edit history. You were, indeed, edit warring to ensure your favored version of the article remained in place. Instead, you should have kept discussing it on the article talk page until consensus was developed. ----jpgordon::==( o ) 15:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.