User talk:Wkerney: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
2over0 (talk | contribs)
→‎August 2013: new section
Line 6: Line 6:


I have requested a review of your edits at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Wkerney reported by User:2over0 (Result: )]]. Your comments would be welcome there. - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 11:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I have requested a review of your edits at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Wkerney reported by User:2over0 (Result: )]]. Your comments would be welcome there. - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 11:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

== Pseudoscience sanction warning ==

{{Ivmbox
| The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to [[pseudoscience]] and [[fringe science]]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Final decision|Final decision]]" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and&nbsp;will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
| Ambox warning pn.svg
| icon size = 40px
}}<!-- This message is derived from Template:Uw-sanctions -->--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 01:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:24, 6 August 2013

I have initiated a discussion at Talk:Alternative medicine#Major undiscussed change, edit warring, copyvio regarding your recent edits to that article. Your comments would be welcome. - 2/0 (cont.) 09:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

I have requested a review of your edits at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Wkerney reported by User:2over0 (Result: ). Your comments would be welcome there. - 2/0 (cont.) 11:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudoscience sanction warning

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to pseudoscience and fringe science. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

--Bbb23 (talk) 01:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]