User talk:Δ: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jack Merridew (talk | contribs)
→‎July 2010: +comment
→‎FYI: new section
Line 27: Line 27:
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 15:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)</div>
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 15:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0058 -->
<!-- EdwardsBot 0058 -->

== FYI ==

[[WP:A/R/CL#Request for clarification: User:Betacommand]]. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:05, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:05, 20 July 2010

Once more I'm off to do some work

archives:  1   2  3   4   5
               6   7  8   9  10
              11 12 13 14 15
              16 17 18 19

July 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Zero-turn mower, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Uh, you want to try again? What, specifically, is disruptive about [1] and [2]? Applying a 4th stage warning is highly inappropriate in this case. Perhaps you should be warned about inappropriate use of templates? If you disagree with the content of the article as Δ left it, take it to the article talk page rather than casting out warning templates to long established users. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is multiple reverts/templates that this user has placed, that where incorrect. He is giving me a final warning for removing a see also section that was completely external links, and for removing inline links to company websites (which where right next to links to their wiki pages) which are not needed and spamish. Jeff may need more of his actions reviewed to see if this is a more serious issue, but due to me already having a conflict of interest I dont want to personally go down that route. If his actions are this inappropriate towards established users, how many users has he bitten? ΔT The only constant 22:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
yup, bitey; and that <font size="4"> sig-vio is still there. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

FYI

WP:A/R/CL#Request for clarification: User:Betacommand. –xenotalk 17:05, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]