Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Amy Wroe Bechtel: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:47, 9 September 2016

Disappearance of Amy Wroe Bechtel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. This kind of thing happens fairly frequently and is of absolutely zero encyclopdic interest. TheLongTone (talk) 15:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes. And just because peple with morbid intests dig up these stories now and again it it does not mean they are of any lasting interest.TheLongTone (talk) 15:41, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NOTNEWS. Unfortunately Amy Wroe Bechtel is not notable for anything other than having disappeared. A plethora of news articles does not make notability. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The nominators "morbid interest" in others "morbid interest" in these kind of articles are interesting. Anyway, this is clearly a IDONTLIKEIT nom based on NOTNEWS. Clearly this case has received plenty of attention. The article is kind of short but that can be fixed. This article covers both WP:GNG, WP:PERSISTENCE. Even the user !voting delete also uses IDONTLIKEIT when referring to the fact that the article subject has been the fixture of plenty of media coverage ever since the disappearance. Tiredly referring to NOTNEWS without going further into your thoughts is just pointless.BabbaQ (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the article creator is a serial creator of worthless articles. The amount of time and energy I devote to attempting to purge Wikipedia of this guff is nothing to the amount of time the article creaor devotes to this guff.TheLongTone (talk) 11:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also repudiate the implications of bad faith iplicit here. @I don't like it my curvy pink butt. I believe this article should be deleted because the subject is not worthy of an encyclopedia article because it is of no lasting interest. There will always be articles on unsolved murders & sisappearances; the topic is of interest but the individual example rarely so.TheLongTone (talk) 11:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Wyoming|list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 19:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Keep''' - The nominators "morbid interest" in others "morbid interest" in these kind of articles are interesting. Anyway, this is clearly a IDONTLIKEIT nom based on NOTNEWS. Clearly this case has received plenty of attention. The article is kind of short but that can be fixed. This article covers both WP:GNG, WP:PERSISTENCE. Even the user !voting delete also uses IDONTLIKEIT when referring to the fact that the article subject has been the fixture of plenty of media coverage ever since the disappearance. Tiredly referring to NOTNEWS without going further into your thoughts is just pointless.[[User:BabbaQ|BabbaQ]] ([[User talk:BabbaQ|talk]]) 19:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
+::Well, the article creator is a serial creator of worthless articles. The amount of time and energy I devote to attempting to purge Wikipedia of this guff is nothing to the amount of time the article creaor devotes to this guff.[[User:TheLongTone|TheLongTone]] ([[User talk:TheLongTone|talk]]) 11:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
+::I also repudiate the implications of bad faith iplicit here. @I don't like it my curvy pink butt. I believe this article should be deleted because the subject is not worthy of an encyclopedia article because it is of no lasting interest. There will always be articles on unsolved murders & sisappearances; the topic is of interest but the individual example rarely so.[[User:TheLongTone|TheLongTone]] ([[User talk:TheLongTone|talk]]) 11:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)