Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwen Tennyson: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:57, 14 March 2022

Gwen Tennyson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There has been an edit war about whether this page should be an article or a redirect, so I'm bringing here to settle it. I am neutral on the matter. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fictional elements, and Television. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 1) I take a very dim view of IP addresses edit warring to make something a redirect, and 2) The Google Scholar and Google News links show sufficient coverage for the character and the actresses who have played her. Jclemens (talk) 05:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, appears to have significant coverage including scholarship such as [1] that describes her as "prominent female character". Pikavoom ^Talk 09:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I, too, see enough coverage in secondary sources to fullfill WP:GNG. The current state of the article is not the desicive critereon. Daranios (talk) 11:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The current article is 100% plot summary and fancruft, there is no reception and creation and design section is based on passing mentions. No sources that contain SIGCOV have been presented (the link by Pkvavoom is broken for me, and Jclemens claim of WP:GOOGLEHITS is not helpful). IF there are good sources, please link them. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 * '''Keep''', appears to have significant coverage including scholarship such as [https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.821.5788&rep=rep1&type=pdf] that describes her as "prominent female character". [[User:Pikavoom|<span style="color:#ff1493; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">Pika</span><span style="color:#FC8A17; font-weight:bold;">voom</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Pikavoom|<span style="color:#ff1493;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 09:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' I, too, see enough coverage in secondary sources to fullfill [[WP:GNG]]. The current state of the article is not the desicive critereon. [[User:Daranios|Daranios]] ([[User talk:Daranios|talk]]) 11:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''. The current article is 100% plot summary and fancruft, there is no reception and creation and design section is based on passing mentions. No sources that contain SIGCOV have been presented (the link by Pkvavoom is broken for me, and Jclemens claim of [[WP:GOOGLEHITS]] is not helpful). IF there are good sources, please link them. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 11:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)