Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Keebaugh: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:10, 10 January 2014

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neither in accordance with WP:BIO1E nor WP:BASIC. After a good-faith search for sources, the deletion rationale and supporting !vote seem valid. COI declaration: I am acquainted with an employee of a UK Raytheon business, but this has not influenced the close, which has been judged on its own merits. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 16:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Keebaugh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been around for a while but the only links I found from reliable sources were brief mentions of him being quoted about the company Raytheon. Fails WP:GNG. Would recommend that article be deleted. JakenBox (talk) 21:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. Neither in accordance with [[WP:BIO1E]] nor [[WP:BASIC]]. After a good-faith search for sources, the deletion rationale and supporting !vote seem valid. [[WP:COI|COI]] declaration: I am acquainted with an employee of a UK [[Raytheon]] business, but this has not influenced the close, which has been judged on its own merits. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">-- [[User:Trevj|Trevj]]</span> ([[User talk:Trevj#top|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Trevj|contribs]]) 16:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 ===[[Mike Keebaugh]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Mike Keebaugh}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Keebaugh|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 29#{{anchorencode:Mike Keebaugh}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mike_Keebaugh Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 9: / Line 15: @@
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
-:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 00:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
+:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 00:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 *'''Delete''' per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. [[User:Candleabracadabra|Candleabracadabra]] ([[User talk:Candleabracadabra|talk]]) 02:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>