Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 July 14: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:29, 19 July 2006

< July 13	July 15 >

14 July 2006

Talifan

I spotted that New guy had created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talifan to raise a question/objection over the speedy deletion of this article. I have told him to come here as the appropriate venue to discuss it. No vote from me. David | Talk 09:41, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Given how there was no debate nor consensus for deletion, is the deletion of this page a legitimate action? — Preceding unsigned comment added by New guy (talk • contribs)

Google cache of article

Article was supposed to be transwikied to Wiktionary, per the cabal, but I don't find it there. -- Fan-1967 14:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's my main concern. It wasn't ported over but deleted entirely. New guy 18:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki to Wikitionary as per mediation cabal. Dionyseus 23:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Wiktionary if they will take it, list on AFD if they will not. When deleting it, Jaranda said [1] "in wiktionary". The Wiktionary deletion log has no record of it being deleted there [2]. So I would suggest asking Jaranda for clarification. BigDT 23:41, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wikitionary has no record of any article by this name being transwikied (wikt:Transwiki#T). --ais523 16:14, 18 July 2006 (U T C)

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 * '''Transwiki''' to Wiktionary if they will take it, '''list on AFD''' if they will not.  When deleting it, Jaranda said [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Talifan] "in wiktionary". The Wiktionary deletion log has no record of it being deleted there [http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=talifan].  So I would suggest asking Jaranda for clarification. [[User:BigDT|BigDT]] 23:41, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Comment''' Wikitionary has no record of any article by this name being transwikied ([[wikt:Transwiki#T]]). --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 16:14, 18 July 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])
-====[[Club Penguin]]====
-I think it is notable enough for a page.  If Runscape has a page, so should CP, since it has more users. --[[User:Thepangelinanpost|Jordan]] 05:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
-*A [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Penguin|legitimate and unanimous]] AfD vote, and seven subsequent deletions of re-posts. This article is the reason why we created {{tl|deletedpage}}. '''Keep deleted'''. [[User:Harro5|Harr]][[WP:EA|<font color="green">o</font>]]<b>[[User talk:Harro5|5]]</b> 08:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Endorse''':  Argument by analogy is a fallacy, and we review the process, not the content.  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 11:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Endorse deletion''', constant re-creations justify the salting, too. --[[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 14:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Keep deleted''' as per above.  [[User:Dionyseus|Dionyseus]] 14:29, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Endorse closure, keep deleted''' per all above and Afd. If Runscape has a page, Runscape has a page. This is not relevant. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup> 22:57, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Speedy keep deleted''', proper AfD closure, no new argument presented.  [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 03:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
-I'm not sure what was in the page that was deleted, or whether it was written objectively or as an advertising blurb. I can say that the website is popular with my children and their friends.  I would appreciate objective information on the website on wikipedia so that I can make up my mind whether it is worthwhile spending money on it.  I have been able to use wikipedia to look at other similiar websites. I suggest that there is public benefit in having some information on it in wikipedia.--[[User:DaProthonotary|DaProthonotary]] 13:06, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
-:Surprisingly, this is this user's only edit to Wikipedia.  I often wonder how new editors are able to find their way to DRV to make their first edits.  [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 20:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
-::'''Comment''' He either has insane luck, dogged persistence, or was linked here. It took me nearly two hours to figure out how to make a deletion nomination my first time. --[[User:Tjstrf|tjstrf]] 09:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
-:::If you go to [[Club Penguin]] it takes you right here. ~ [[User:Trialsanderrors|trialsanderrors]] 09:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
-::::I edited Wikipedia for something like six months before discovering that AfD/DRV (then VfD/VfU) even existed. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]] 18:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-:::::Actually, it was rather easy to find. You just type "Club Penguin" into the search box on the left and click go and there are links straight there. I have never felt the urge to edit before, so have not registered. I use wikipedia for what it was intended, a general knowledge research tool, which means I read it. Putting that aside, my argument still stands, the website still merits an entry, even if it reads "Club Penguin: Mostly harmless (or mostly useless, if that is your point of view)". --[[User:DaProthonotary|DaProthonotary]] 10:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)