Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020–2022 Pakistani political crises

2020–2022 Pakistani political crises

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOR. This article cites no sources that describe how these various topics or crises are connected to one another, and the article does not make that clear either. It is also internally inconsistent: The lead has the crises start in 2022, whereas the title has them start in 2020. Sandstein 14:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 14:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 14:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also of note: the article was created by a now-blocked sock, MasterOfMetaverse, although it has since been edited by others. Sandstein 14:57, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it was created by a sock puppet. I started the original political crises article, 2022 vote of no confidence in the Imran Khan ministry, which was renamed & copy/pasted without discussion. Elmisnter! (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but change the scope to only 2022, so that all the recent political events are captured, especially those in Punjab province. Mar4d (talk) 16:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
agree completely Gandalf1902 (talk) 23:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename per Mar4d. --Bedivere (talk) 03:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename. Hivedrops (talk) 16:43, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All of these "keep" opinions don't address the reason for deletion, namely, that it is original research to group these topics together, and that not even the article makes clear why they are grouped together. Sandstein 20:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The mentioned articles are surely connected to each other. The article was created as 2022 Pakistani political crises, @Panam2014 moved it to 2020–2022 Pakistani political crises, maybe just to add the PDM Protest - but it must be stated in the background of the article. And I'm proposing move to its previous name. Ainty Painty (talk) 09:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ainty Painty, how are these articles connected to each other? Are there reliable sources that say so? Sandstein 15:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with nominee that it is not sourced or clear how these events are connected or should be considered one crisis. If narrowed down to 2022 Pakistani political crisis, this would be a content fork from 2022 Pakistani constitutional crisis and No-confidence motion in Imran Khan. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 14:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename Per Mar4d and Ainty Painty. 103.141.159.74 (talk) 19:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename as per Ainty Painty User4edits (talk) 22:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment if we are moving, can we move the original article here to its actual name and then copy paste the contents with proper edit summary. Same sock puppet, who created this article, copy blanked the original article of the same name, I don't know why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elminster Aumar (talk • contribs) 06:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ainty Painty and Mar4d. Maybe the vote of no confidence part can be subsumed by this article given that it is a part of the entire crises. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge with "2022 Pakistani constitutional crisis". WP:Duplicate article. --Fontaine347 (talk) 15:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon (talk) 06:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Other incidents were also included, as the country is still going through a political crisis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ainty Painty (talk • contribs) 19 April 2022 07:05 (UTC)
Delete Those !voting keep have not demonstrated that the content of the article is anything other than a series of events over a certain time period. There's not a single source which *both* groups these events (a) together and (b) all as crises; reliable sources doing that is what is required to demonstrate notability. The implicit definition here renders the word crisis meaningless. The article is WP:SYNTH. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 07:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Political history of Pakistan. "Crisis" is editorializing. And there is no need for a stand-alone article. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 22:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]