Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abacus Solutions

Abacus Solutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The only non-press release source with some coverage is crn.com, a (from the looks of it) minor tech/business website. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the CRN link for the one in-depth article there (there are others with passing mentions); the reference link currently being used appears not to be working. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Single passing reference in NYTimes. Not finding anything else beyond what is already in the article. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 04:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 22:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]