Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BassMonster Records

BassMonster Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a speedy for BassMonster Records, as the article makes a claim of notability as "one of the top dance labels in Norway". However, I am unable to verify this claim, I can find no reliable references that discuss the topic, (fails WP:GNG), and none of the artists are notable (fails WP:NMUSIC #5) - all blue links are to unrelated topics. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a newly founded company of 2012 is unlikely to have better coverage to suggest convincing notability and there's nothing else noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 19:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can find virtually no reliable sources and has signed no notable artists. cyberdog958^Talk 08:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]