Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capri Anderson (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
This sounds better |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
We have been here before. She has now won an industry award that leads to no real world reliable coverage and I personally feel that PORNBIO is not a reliable SNG because it contradicts BLP that requires proper sourcing for biographical articles. I therefore do not feel the AVN = a notable second event and that this remains essentially a BLP1E. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 13:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |
We have been here before. She has now won an industry award that leads to no real world reliable coverage and I personally feel that PORNBIO is not a reliable SNG because it contradicts BLP that requires proper sourcing for biographical articles. I therefore do not feel the AVN = a notable second event and that this remains essentially a BLP1E. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 13:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
*What? Why ''doesn't'' it lead to "no real world reliable coverage"? This has been discussed a second time very thoroughly not only on the WP:BIO talk page, but on this article's talk page as well (including with the admin that deleted it, who now endorses it). You even acknowledge that she won the award (Best Supporting Actress, not a scene-related award), so this reeks of [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT]]. (Or are you just calling BLP1E because of her connection to Charlie Sheen?) '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">[[User:Erpert|Who ''is'' this guy?]]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">[[User talk:Erpert|Wanna talk about it?]]</span></sup></small> 18:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |
*What? Why ''doesn't'' it lead to "no real world reliable coverage"? This has been discussed a second time very thoroughly not only on the WP:BIO talk page, but on this article's talk page as well (including with the admin that deleted it, who now endorses it). You even acknowledge that she won the award (Best Supporting Actress, not a scene-related award), so this reeks of [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT]]. (Or are you just calling BLP1E because of her connection to Charlie Sheen?) '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">[[User:Erpert|Who ''is'' this guy?]]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">[[User talk:Erpert|Wanna talk about it?]]</span></sup></small> 18:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep'''. Outside of what the nominator "''[[Wikipedia:POINT|personally feels]]''", the subject clearly passes our notability guidelines. She won an [[AVN Award]] for best supporting actress, she was nominated to a [[XBIZ Award]] for best actress and to several other AVN Awards for best actress, crossover star of the year, best web starlet and best tease performance (plus a bunch of scene awards that, per consensus, do not count towards notability). Even ignoring [[WP:PORNBIO]], that quite recently received widespread consensus on its actual version, how she fails [[WP:ANYBIO]]? Wikipedia is not [[WP:CENSOR|censored]], and she is clearly notable in her field. I ask myself if the nominator would have rised the same objections if Anderson was an award winning graphic designer, or a clay pigeon shooter. [[User:Cavarrone|Cavarrone]] ([[User talk:Cavarrone|talk]]) 19:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:51, 14 February 2013
Capri Anderson
AfDs for this article:
- Capri Anderson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We have been here before. She has now won an industry award that leads to no real world reliable coverage and I personally feel that PORNBIO is not a reliable SNG because it contradicts BLP that requires proper sourcing for biographical articles. I therefore do not feel the AVN = a notable second event and that this remains essentially a BLP1E. Spartaz Humbug! 13:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- What? Why doesn't it lead to "no real world reliable coverage"? This has been discussed a second time very thoroughly not only on the WP:BIO talk page, but on this article's talk page as well (including with the admin that deleted it, who now endorses it). You even acknowledge that she won the award (Best Supporting Actress, not a scene-related award), so this reeks of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. (Or are you just calling BLP1E because of her connection to Charlie Sheen?) Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 18:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Outside of what the nominator "personally feels", the subject clearly passes our notability guidelines. She won an AVN Award for best supporting actress, she was nominated to a XBIZ Award for best actress and to several other AVN Awards for best actress, crossover star of the year, best web starlet and best tease performance (plus a bunch of scene awards that, per consensus, do not count towards notability). Even ignoring WP:PORNBIO, that quite recently received widespread consensus on its actual version, how she fails WP:ANYBIO? Wikipedia is not censored, and she is clearly notable in her field. I ask myself if the nominator would have rised the same objections if Anderson was an award winning graphic designer, or a clay pigeon shooter. Cavarrone (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)