Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conjugal love: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
::::Oh yeah, that makes sense. [[User:BuySomeApples|BuySomeApples]] ([[User talk:BuySomeApples|talk]]) 01:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
::::Oh yeah, that makes sense. [[User:BuySomeApples|BuySomeApples]] ([[User talk:BuySomeApples|talk]]) 01:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
:'''Keep''' imo, although it clearly badly needs improvement. Google scholar is giving me a plethora of articles discussing this as a philosophical topic. — [[User:Moriwen|Moriwen]] ([[User talk:Moriwen|talk]]) 23:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
:'''Keep''' imo, although it clearly badly needs improvement. Google scholar is giving me a plethora of articles discussing this as a philosophical topic. — [[User:Moriwen|Moriwen]] ([[User talk:Moriwen|talk]]) 23:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' -- Not unsourced. Yes it is brief, but it is more than a dictionary definition. [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 17:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:28, 21 January 2024

Conjugal love

Conjugal love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary definition tag; possible Original Research and synthesis of information. GnocchiFan (talk) 15:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, that makes sense. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep imo, although it clearly badly needs improvement. Google scholar is giving me a plethora of articles discussing this as a philosophical topic. — Moriwen (talk) 23:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- Not unsourced. Yes it is brief, but it is more than a dictionary definition. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]