Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conrad Poohs (2nd nomination)
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnmaFinotera (talk | contribs) at 06:35, 2 August 2010 (→[[Conrad Poohs]]: link and template updates; editing per policy; see talk page using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect, nothing to merge (already mentioned in article) but potentially useful search term anyway. Fram (talk) 14:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Conrad Poohs
procedural nomination—version brought to AFD: This was previously involved in a train wreck AFD which yielded no consensus. Now found in the PROD workstream; PROD nominator states "fails WP:EPISODE guidelines as there are no reliable sources to prove it's individual notability. Also fails WP:PLOT". User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: WikiProject Monty Python has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - Merge with Monty Python's Flying Circus. --Pmedema (talk) 18:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. No individual notability, had links to copyright violations (which I have since deleted).Kww (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Speaking as a huge fan of this sketch, the lack of established notability is pretty blatent. I have no reason to believe that independent sources establishing notability per WP:FICT exist. -Verdatum (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Monty Python's Flying Circus as lacking independent notability. What a freaky looking face though...--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:FICT. Doctorfluffy (talk) 18:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 21:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:FICT and has no assertion of notability at all. AnmaFinotera (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —AnmaFinotera (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.