Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot milk cake

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep as rewritten. -- BD2412 ^talk 03:56, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Hot milk cake[edit]

Wikipedia is not a cookbook. Transwiki to WikiBooks. Acetic Acid 00:44, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

Delete Recipe looks good but delete as per above I mean transwiki --Dysepsion 01:11, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki; Misplaced, Weird recipe | Celcius 01:16, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep what's left. (Changed from Transwiki).Alf 12:29, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki the recipe and keep the non-recipe part. Kappa 02:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki the lot of it.- Mgm|^(talk) 07:44, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
The article has been transwikied into the Cookbook. All of the editors who voted transwiki above (apart from Kappa), please choose another option. Uncle G 09:54:47, 2005-08-24 (UTC)
Keep what is left, looks valid. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:55, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for the speedy response. Acetic Acid 10:18, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
Keep looks like it's been transwikied already --Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 10:32, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep valid informative stub. Alphax ^τεχ 10:36, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with cookbook links to actual recipe and stub notice. If the consensus is against this, merge cookbook links with "list of varieties" in the cake article. --Eoghanacht 13:32, 2005 August 24 (UTC)
Keep as above. Trollderella 21:15, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into cake. Lacks encyclopedic content. -- Visviva 03:53, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep better tasting than a urinal cake. Klonimus 08:06, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I vote to move Klonimus' hilarious comment over to BJAODN after this VfD is finished. Acetic Acid 08:24, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

All together now, in four-part harmony: Klonimus, how do you know?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.