Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Wheeldon: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kmweber (talk | contribs)
response
Line 11: Line 11:


* '''Delete''' Fails [[WP:ATHLETE]] [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 19:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Fails [[WP:ATHLETE]] [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 19:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' The article seems to have reliable sources. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 19:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:54, 5 April 2008

Jonathan Wheeldon

Jonathan Wheeldon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod (no explanation). Player fails WP:BIO#Athletes as has never played in a fully professional league. пﮟოьεԻ 57 17:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. пﮟოьεԻ 57 17:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep — The individual clearly exists. There is no need for a player to play in a professional league; we have articles on loads of American college athletes. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 18:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I clearly exist, yet there is no article on me. The highest level this guy has played at is the ninth level of English football, or the fourth division of Belgian football. Playing at that level is clearly not notable, and neither is the person given 46 Ghits. пﮟოьεԻ 57 19:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • The fact that you exist means that an article about you is perfectly appropriate. "Notability" is irrelevant and wrong, as it is both totally arbitrary and utterly undefinable. Verifiable existence is the only relevant criterion. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 19:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The player obviously fails WP:ATHLETE as he hasn't played a match as a professional footballer, and he has done nothing that would make him otherwise notable. – PeeJay 18:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]