Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unicorns

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jtrrs0 (talk | contribs) at 16:25, 3 April 2024 (fixing indentation in own comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

List of unicorns

List of unicorns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This "list of unicorns in modern popular culture, chiefly literature, film and television" is an INDISCRIMINATE collection of TRIVIA which doesn't meet standalone list notability standards. The article lacks citations, and contains no indication this list topic has ever been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources as required per NLIST.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 00:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Fictional elements.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 00:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 01:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Way too undereferenced. WP:NOTTVTROPES, WP:IPC. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep: I really, truly hate to defend thinly-sourced cruft like this article, but a handful of sources could be found: [1], [2], both of which cover unicorns in popular culture. This suggests the topic of the list has been discussed as a group. If kept, this article needs a LOT of work, and any unsourced entry (i.e. essentially all of them) should either be removed or given a proper secondary reference. If nobody is willing to do that, delete. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. List of legendary proportions. LISTN per above. Hyperbolick (talk) 06:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete/merge: this is just trivia. Contrary to @WeirdNAnnoyed, I don't think the subject would be supported by the sources they found. Those sources might justify an article called 'Unicorns in popular culture', but not a list of unicorns without anything else. I would say that some of this content could be moved to a new 'Unicorns in popular culture' section in the main Unicorn article. If the page is kept it should at least be moved to 'List of unicorns in popular culture'.
Jtrrs0 (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]