Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewPipe (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 19:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|NewPipe (2nd nomination)]]</noinclude></p>
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 19:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|NewPipe (2nd nomination)]]</noinclude></p>
*'''Delete''' Press releases/PR sources aplenty, links to their own website. Bild is about the only thing covering them for an RS. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 20:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Press releases/PR sources aplenty, links to their own website. Bild is about the only thing covering them for an RS. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 20:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' [[Louis Rossmann]] devoted a video to them.--[[User:Froglich|Froglich]] ([[User talk:Froglich|talk]]) 06:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' [[Louis Rossmann]] devoted a video to them.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tll_2etrDfM</ref>--[[User:Froglich|Froglich]] ([[User talk:Froglich|talk]]) 06:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:08, 27 October 2022

NewPipe

NewPipe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Product fails WP:NPRODUCT. Not only are the sources in the article primary or not reliable, but also there are no other sources that are significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources that could be found by searching on Google. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong Keep. NewPipe was featured on a big German newspaper called Bild. I don't know if the "Google test" is still a thing, but if it is, NewPipe is widely talked about on technology blogs and forums. Maybe more reliable sources could be found. –Daveout(talk) 23:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Newpipe is a relatively well known alternative for watching YouTube videos. One single person who hasn't heard of the tool or doesn't understand the reason for the need, seems seems like a poor reason to deem the work of 100s of devs over 7 years as, "Not Notable". Especially knowing some of the very arcane items (some with very little data) that WP lists.
How did I see this "deletion" page? Newpipe has been referenced multiple times over multiple years at ghacks.net (Most recently - https://www.ghacks.net/2022/10/21/google-is-increasing-the-price-of-youtube-premium-family-significantly/) and after all of the posts about it over the years, I wanted to learn more. 70.112.82.122 (talk) 06:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Press releases/PR sources aplenty, links to their own website. Bild is about the only thing covering them for an RS. Oaktree b (talk) 20:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Louis Rossmann devoted a video to them.[1]--Froglich (talk) 06:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]