Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Medina: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 12: Line 12:
*'''Delete''' The article barely talks about "New Medina" and almost all the sources are "background" except for the one book mentioned by OP. Obvious [[WP:OR]]. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 17:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' The article barely talks about "New Medina" and almost all the sources are "background" except for the one book mentioned by OP. Obvious [[WP:OR]]. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 17:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
:*[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]], the creator even got a DYK of the article. A ridiculously ahistorical line—{{tq|''Pakistan was envisioned as the New Medina to be used as a staging point for the conquest and Islamisation of India, similar to the conquest of Mecca by Muhammad''}}—was featured on the Main Page for a good 24 hours, based on a primary source. A case is to be made for why all DYKs related to Indian history/politics shall be advertised on WT:INB before passing to main page. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 07:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
:*[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]], the creator even got a DYK of the article. A ridiculously ahistorical line—{{tq|''Pakistan was envisioned as the New Medina to be used as a staging point for the conquest and Islamisation of India, similar to the conquest of Mecca by Muhammad''}}—was featured on the Main Page for a good 24 hours, based on a primary source. A case is to be made for why all DYKs related to Indian history/politics shall be advertised on WT:INB before passing to main page. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 07:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
*::Do they even read the article before slapping a DYK on it? Yes, we need to have a system of checking DYKs before they get posted. God knows what sort of stuff gets publicized there. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 13:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
* '''Delete:''' A BEFORE search brings nothing about this. Uh, this is without foundation: '''Allah's "secret design" for Pakistan''' [[WP:FRINGE]]. --[[User:Whiteguru|Whiteguru]] ([[User talk:Whiteguru|talk]]) 02:42, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
* '''Delete:''' A BEFORE search brings nothing about this. Uh, this is without foundation: '''Allah's "secret design" for Pakistan''' [[WP:FRINGE]]. --[[User:Whiteguru|Whiteguru]] ([[User talk:Whiteguru|talk]]) 02:42, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
* '''Delete:''' None of the sources here, as far as I see, really discuss or establish the notability of "New Medina" [[User:Deathlibrarian|Deathlibrarian]] ([[User talk:Deathlibrarian|talk]]) 10:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
* '''Delete:''' None of the sources here, as far as I see, really discuss or establish the notability of "New Medina" [[User:Deathlibrarian|Deathlibrarian]] ([[User talk:Deathlibrarian|talk]]) 10:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:58, 20 December 2021

New Medina

New Medina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is absolutely nothing on this topic (neologism - ?) other than a single book—Creating a New Medina: State Power, Islam, and the Quest for Pakistan in Late Colonial North India—, written in 2015 by one Venkat Dhulipala and book-reviews thereof. There is a potential article to be written about the book but this is not it.

The book has been subject to harsh criticism from a variety of quarters but not unsurprisingly, Dhulipala believes all of them (Faisal Devji, Barbara D. Metcalf, Yasmin Khan, and Manan Ahmed Asif) to be in the wrong and peddling half-truths, lies and distortions. In summary, we are looking at a revolutionary fringe work - if it were not, the concept might have stood a chance of being notable in itself.TrangaBellam (talk) 16:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • RegentsPark, the creator even got a DYK of the article. A ridiculously ahistorical line—Pakistan was envisioned as the New Medina to be used as a staging point for the conquest and Islamisation of India, similar to the conquest of Mecca by Muhammad—was featured on the Main Page for a good 24 hours, based on a primary source. A case is to be made for why all DYKs related to Indian history/politics shall be advertised on WT:INB before passing to main page. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do they even read the article before slapping a DYK on it? Yes, we need to have a system of checking DYKs before they get posted. God knows what sort of stuff gets publicized there. --RegentsPark (comment) 13:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A BEFORE search brings nothing about this. Uh, this is without foundation: Allah's "secret design" for Pakistan WP:FRINGE. --Whiteguru (talk) 02:42, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: None of the sources here, as far as I see, really discuss or establish the notability of "New Medina" Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]