Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics in the British Isles: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Politics in the British Isles: of course, the article exists
Line 24: Line 24:
* '''Delete''' As a [[WP:POVFORK|POV fork]]. There are only two sovereign states in the archipelago. The politics of the archipelago is thus more than sufficiently met by [[Ireland-United Kingdom relations]] and the main [[British Isles]] article. The mere existence of a particular string of words in a published source (in this case "politics of the British Isles", or just, as easily, "British-Irish politics", or "Anglo-Irish politics", etc.) does not, in itself, merit a separate article. --[[User:Rannpháirtí anaithnid|<span style="color:black;">RA</span>]] ([[User talk:Rannpháirtí anaithnid|talk]]) 09:10, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' As a [[WP:POVFORK|POV fork]]. There are only two sovereign states in the archipelago. The politics of the archipelago is thus more than sufficiently met by [[Ireland-United Kingdom relations]] and the main [[British Isles]] article. The mere existence of a particular string of words in a published source (in this case "politics of the British Isles", or just, as easily, "British-Irish politics", or "Anglo-Irish politics", etc.) does not, in itself, merit a separate article. --[[User:Rannpháirtí anaithnid|<span style="color:black;">RA</span>]] ([[User talk:Rannpháirtí anaithnid|talk]]) 09:10, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Looks like Karl is now looking to canvas: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Matt_Lewis&diff=prev&oldid=494422526],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Midnightblueowl&diff=prev&oldid=494422503],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Klemen_Kocjancic&diff=prev&oldid=494422483],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abtract&diff=prev&oldid=494422475],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thejmii&diff=prev&oldid=494422460],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dallyripple&diff=prev&oldid=494422443], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pinethicket&diff=prev&oldid=494422389] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sabrebd&diff=prev&oldid=494422426]. [[User:Bjmullan|Bjmullan]] ([[User talk:Bjmullan|talk]]) 09:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Looks like Karl is now looking to canvas: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Matt_Lewis&diff=prev&oldid=494422526],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Midnightblueowl&diff=prev&oldid=494422503],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Klemen_Kocjancic&diff=prev&oldid=494422483],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abtract&diff=prev&oldid=494422475],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thejmii&diff=prev&oldid=494422460],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dallyripple&diff=prev&oldid=494422443], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pinethicket&diff=prev&oldid=494422389] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sabrebd&diff=prev&oldid=494422426]. [[User:Bjmullan|Bjmullan]] ([[User talk:Bjmullan|talk]]) 09:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The claim of the nomination - that politics "does not occur within a geographic area like the British Isles" - is obviously false and seems quite tendentious. There seem to be plenty of sources which frame the topic in this way and here's another one: ''[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=RxGectYEAo0C The Political Development of the British Isles]''. [[User:Colonel Warden|Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 10:53, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:53, 26 May 2012

Politics in the British Isles

Politics in the British Isles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL) (another term used to describe the same)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL) (another term used to describe the same)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL) (another term used to describe the same)

Conflation of geographic term (British Isles) with politics. Politics occurs in the sovereign states as in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland or the Republic of Ireland. It does not occur within a geographic area like the British Isles. For example, we do not have a Politics in the Levant article. Multiple OR issues. Snappy (talk) 21:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Snappy (talk) 22:08, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Snappy (talk) 22:12, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete This is pure OR and another of Karl's pointless cats/articles. BTW I do not need Karl commenting on my input. And can I also request that he keeps his input to the absolute minimum here (and for that matter at other delete discussions). Thanks. Bjmullan (talk) 22:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • strong keep Politics in the British Isles is the subject of endless streams of ink. Given the shared history (see History of the British Isles and recent creation of multi-lateral bodies whose scope is the whole of the British isles, a survey article like this one is completely reasonable, not OR, and obviously notable. If your general argument is with the intersection of politics and regions, well, we also have Water politics in the Middle East, Water politics in the Nile Basin, Politics of the Caribbean, Politics of the European Union, Politics of Europe, for starters; but I suppose you might respond that WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS? If you can point out the OR, you are of course welcome to improve the article. I'm just not sure why you are saying this article is OR, or which parts are OR? Also, this is not WP:SYN, because no additional conclusions are being drawn about politics in the british isles that isn't supported by references. Nice to see you too BJ. --KarlB (talk) 22:18, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment here is a recent book source, which uses a similar title to that of this article:
    • Nicholas Aylott, Iain Ogilvie, John Barry (2003). The Politics of the British Isles: A Comparative Introduction. Sage Pubs. ISBN 978-0761969600.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) --KarlB (talk) 22:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment OK, this is getting tedious. I think we have a problem here and would direct Karl to examine the Wikipedia:General sanctions with regard to the term "British Isles". While Karl's exact behavior is not typical of the sort we have seen before on this issue it is touching on disruptive and is certainly tendentious. --RA (talk) 22:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi. Thanks RA for your suggestion; I have read about the general sanctions, but in this case I don't think there is a violation; in fact the discussions on the CfD have brought to light lots of interesting material about politics within and between these countries. While the category is fine, an article is also of value here. If we end up renaming the category, then the article could be renamed too, but I don't see that as a reason to delete. I welcome your continued contributions to improve the encyclopedia. --KarlB (talk) 22:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment for another reference, attesting notibility, see this recent book: The Atlantic Archipelago A Political History of the British Isles "Presents a comprehensive political history of what are usually known as the British Isles without taking an Anglocentric point of view."] If you are searching for sources, I'd suggest looking under 'Atlantic archipelago' as well, as many sources are now using this term. If wikipedia moves to this term as well, then of course this article should be renamed. But I'd ask all those voting to please consider this is a deletion discussion, not a renaming discussion, so the title is not at issue - what is at issue is whether the contents are notable and sourced.--KarlB (talk) 23:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. There is a common political system - with variations - in most of the area and a different system in the Irish state. This article is the equivalent of a basket of apples with one pear. The same is not true of Europe, the EU, the Middle East etc. An article on bilateral relations between the UK and Ireland makes sense. This does not. Scolaire (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As a POV fork. There are only two sovereign states in the archipelago. The politics of the archipelago is thus more than sufficiently met by Ireland-United Kingdom relations and the main British Isles article. The mere existence of a particular string of words in a published source (in this case "politics of the British Isles", or just, as easily, "British-Irish politics", or "Anglo-Irish politics", etc.) does not, in itself, merit a separate article. --RA (talk) 09:10, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Looks like Karl is now looking to canvas: [10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15], [16] and [17]. Bjmullan (talk) 09:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The claim of the nomination - that politics "does not occur within a geographic area like the British Isles" - is obviously false and seems quite tendentious. There seem to be plenty of sources which frame the topic in this way and here's another one: The Political Development of the British Isles. Warden (talk) 10:53, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]