Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shipping discourse: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Shipping discourse: Closed as speedily kept (XFDcloser) |
present tense |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
||
The result was ''' |
The result was '''speedy keep'''__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • she/her) 04:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
===[[:Shipping discourse]]=== |
===[[:Shipping discourse]]=== |
||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
Latest revision as of 04:58, 16 April 2024
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Shipping discourse[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shipping discourse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Again, I don't see how a bunch of bored academics+A bunch of very bored journalists with nothing better to write about+a bunch of very bored people with nothing better to talk about=The sex lives and proclivities of a bunch of imaginary people. Americanfreedom (talk) 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep as this article is currently on the main page (WP:SKCRIT#6). Elli (talk | contribs) 04:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. This nomination reads like WP:IDONTLIKEIT, no actual reason for deletion has been provided. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. There are no issues with the quality or notability of this article and WP:SIGCOV is clearly satisfied here despite the topic being a relatively new internet phenomenon. "it's strange/frivolous" is not a valid deletion rationale. This AfD and Americanfreedom's repeated (ab)use of the prod tag is pure WP:IDONTLIKEIT.
- (Disclaimer: I have discussed this article off-wiki with its creator, Generalissima, on several occasions, however, she did not in any way prompt me to participate in this AfD and the opinion expressed here is my own.) Ethmostigmus (talk) 04:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. <signature>
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. <signature>
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.