Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War crimes by unconventional weapons

War crimes by unconventional weapons

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a WP:BIASed selection of purported war crimes conducted largely by the West. The "war crimes" were either not War crimes at the relevant time or were conducted by countries that were not signatories to the relevant international convention(s). This selective retrospective application is non-encyclopaedic and does not belong here. We already have a detailed page on War crimes and specific pages for various events and countries, where all relevant events should be listed. Mztourist (talk) 04:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 04:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:POVFORK. Quite an effort really, not one actual war crime in the whole article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads like list of military operations I dislike. There seems to be no evidence that the vast majority of incidents were actually war crimes. Googleguy007 (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as both POVFORK and BIAS. Intothat darkness 17:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per pretty much all of the above. There is really no way I can see to salvage anything here. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 21:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
keep 1- According to Wikipedia:Guide to deletion: “A failure to conform to a neutral point of view is usually remedied through editing for neutrality” So, with respect, if there is a POV, it is not a reason to delete the article.

2- I agree that events have a specific page and specific pages and I tried to list all of these on one page. We can change the name of the article to the list of these events.M1nhm (talk) 11:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]