Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilderness Air: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
keep |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
**'''Comment''' - Those Google News Search that you gave us in the link was about a company in Brunswick, Maine not the one that we are talking about in Ontario. [[User:Whenaxis|Whenaxis]] ([[User talk:Whenaxis|talk]]) 22:13, 12 April 2010 (UTC) |
**'''Comment''' - Those Google News Search that you gave us in the link was about a company in Brunswick, Maine not the one that we are talking about in Ontario. [[User:Whenaxis|Whenaxis]] ([[User talk:Whenaxis|talk]]) 22:13, 12 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' despite the claim that it is an airline, it appears to be an air taxi company, providing ad-hoc charters. It does not appear to operate a regular scheduled service. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 04:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' despite the claim that it is an airline, it appears to be an air taxi company, providing ad-hoc charters. It does not appear to operate a regular scheduled service. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 04:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' given its age of nearly 30 years, it is likely there are some sources. Being an airline, also, it is likely there are sources. It is not likely anyone would have heard of it to write about it if not for its sources. [[User:Dew Kane|Dew Kane]] ([[User talk:Dew Kane|talk]]) 04:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:36, 15 April 2010
Wilderness Air
- Wilderness Air (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unnotable airline, no references and only its homepage appears on Google Whenaxis (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Fails to indicate notability, and there's no third-party coverage to be found. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 17:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Surely real, boarders on non-notable, but lacks 3rd party coverage. default we should keep and find sources. It's an airline. Outback the koala (talk) 05:49, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Google news search at the top of the AFD finds over a hundred results. Some of them are about this company. [1] Some are about other things. There are enough about the company to count as notable coverage. Dream Focus 14:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete despite the claim that it is an airline, it appears to be an air taxi company, providing ad-hoc charters. It does not appear to operate a regular scheduled service. Mjroots (talk) 04:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep given its age of nearly 30 years, it is likely there are some sources. Being an airline, also, it is likely there are sources. It is not likely anyone would have heard of it to write about it if not for its sources. Dew Kane (talk) 04:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)