Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Gab (social network): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Gab (social network): Rejecting for insufficient acceptance |
MediationBot (talk | contribs) Case rejected, adjusting category. Errors? User:MediationBot/shutoff/MedComClerk |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Medcombox/top|article=Gab (social network)}} |
{{Medcombox/top|article=Gab (social network)}} |
||
=== Gab (social network) === |
=== Gab (social network) === |
||
{{Rejected case}} |
|||
{{RFMpointer|''The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.''}} |
{{RFMpointer|''The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.''}} |
||
Line 37: | Line 36: | ||
*'''Reject.''' Failed to satisfy [[WP:MC/P#PRECOND|prerequisite for mediation]] #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation". For the Mediation Commitee, [[User:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:blue; font-variant:small-caps;">'''TransporterMan'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; font-size: x-small;">TALK</span>]]) 20:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC) (Chairperson) |
*'''Reject.''' Failed to satisfy [[WP:MC/P#PRECOND|prerequisite for mediation]] #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation". For the Mediation Commitee, [[User:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:blue; font-variant:small-caps;">'''TransporterMan'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; font-size: x-small;">TALK</span>]]) 20:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC) (Chairperson) |
||
{{Medcombox/bottom}}<noinclude>[[Category: |
{{Medcombox/bottom}}<noinclude>[[Category:Requests for mediation rejected requests|Sample]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 21:27, 31 October 2018
Gab (social network)[edit]
- Editors involved in this dispute
- Ginjuice4445 (talk · contribs) – filing party
- Ravensfire (talk · contribs)
- PeterTheFourth (talk · contribs)
- Grayfell (talk · contribs)
- Articles affected by this dispute
- Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
Issues to be mediated[edit]
- Primary issues (added by the filing party)
- Biased editors are blanket deleting a new, well-researched introduction to a controversial subject and replacing it with an inaccurate, politically charged accusation which the new introduction, drafted from WP:NPOV, contradicts, and refusing to engage substantively with the Talk page discussion on the subject. The other editors mischaracterize attempts to promote WP:NPOV as a "false balance." Consensus in this setting will be impossible and a disinterested mediator should intervene.
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]
- Agree. Ginjuice4445 (talk) 01:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- Decline - the request is so hopeless between personal attacks and the obvious entrenchment of the editor that this simply is a waste of everyone's time. Ravensfire (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]
- Question. @Ravensfire: I cannot see where you have substantively contributed to the talk page discussion. If mediation does not proceed, what discussion or consensus-building activity do you intend to take up? Will you continue reverting changes to the article? AGK ■ 21:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Reject. Failed to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation". For the Mediation Commitee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC) (Chairperson)