Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs) Tag: Reverted |
→Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: reply to HJ Mitchell: I would call this {{likely}}. Blocking. (-) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*I'm gonna say {{possilikely}}. A single edit it not a lot of behavioural evidence to go on but there are technical similarities. I'd like a second opinion from someone who has more experience checking AHJ. {{u|L235|Kevin}}, are you around today? [[User:HJ Mitchell|<b style="color: teal; font-family: Tahoma">HJ Mitchell</b>]] | [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<span style="color: navy; font-family: Times New Roman" title="(Talk page)">Penny for your thoughts?</span>]] 14:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC) |
*I'm gonna say {{possilikely}}. A single edit it not a lot of behavioural evidence to go on but there are technical similarities. I'd like a second opinion from someone who has more experience checking AHJ. {{u|L235|Kevin}}, are you around today? [[User:HJ Mitchell|<b style="color: teal; font-family: Tahoma">HJ Mitchell</b>]] | [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<span style="color: navy; font-family: Times New Roman" title="(Talk page)">Penny for your thoughts?</span>]] 14:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
*:I would call this {{likely}}. Blocking. '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 17:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 17:10, 31 January 2024
AndresHerutJaim
- AndresHerutJaim (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim/Archive.
This case's socks should have their talk page and email access revoked due to abuse.
31 January 2024
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Thystaf (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools
Account apparently created to restore the edit of a previous sock, Cheezlander. This brand-new account also casually mentioned the BLP policy in its first edit summary, which is odd, and that edit summary was phrased somewhat similarly to the edit of the now-blocked sock whose edit it was restoring. I could be wrong, this could just be a random person who agreed with the edit in question, but it looks fairly odd. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- On the other hand, the first edit on this new account was a mobile edit, which does not appear to be this vandal's MO. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh actually yes it is, sometimes. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I'm gonna say
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely). A single edit it not a lot of behavioural evidence to go on but there are technical similarities. I'd like a second opinion from someone who has more experience checking AHJ. Kevin, are you around today? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
