Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Darknipples: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>


{{ping|Pudeo}} Did you notify Darknipples that you've started an SPI aginst her? [[User:Lightbreather|Lightbreather]] ([[User talk:Lightbreather|talk]]) 21:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 21:30, 24 January 2015

Darknipples

Darknipples (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
24 January 2015

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


The IP address who had their first edit on 22 December 2014 posted a long WP:AE case about Mike Searson and Lightbreather. The request has diffs dating back from 2013 and it is easily seen that the IP is not new to Wikipedia. The request itself has almost been like written on behalf of Lightbreather, detailing the conduct of Mike Searson towards LB.

The IP however likely isn't LB. The IP's editing pattern is strongly connected to Gun show loophole controversy like Darknipples'. The user interaction tool reveals [1] three different user talkpages which both Darknipples and the IP have edited: User talk:Mike Searson, User talk:Lightbreather and User talk:Anastrophe. The interaction at Anastrophe's is especially curious: Darknipples has thanked the user before for gun related edit and the IP later asked advice about GA related to gun articles. On Talk:Gun show loophole controversy#Past Controversies Section, Darknipples has made a new section where the IP responds Scalhotrod but Darknipples does not.

The IP filing the AE request "on behalf of" Lightbreather can be explained with that Lightbreather and Darknipples seem to be wikifriends (Darknipples' talkpage history) and they have worked together on the Gun show loophole controversy article. In a previous SPI Lightbreather was accused to be Darknipples, but I think it's more likely that they're wikifriends. --Pudeo' 07:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Pudeo: Did you notify Darknipples that you've started an SPI aginst her? Lightbreather (talk) 21:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments