Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stoubora/Archive: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Archiving case from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stoubora |
Anachronist (talk | contribs) →Comments by other users: added identity of sockpuppet company |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
;Late comment after archiving this case: |
|||
{{ping|Ponyo}} {{ping|Vanjagenije}} {{ping|Doc James}} [[User:John Stannie]] is apparently "Brad Arquette" (possibly another pseudonym) of [http://www.wikipediaservices.com/ Wikipedia Services] according to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&diff=prev&oldid=798342099 this undeletion request] at [[WP:RFU]]. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 18:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
Revision as of 18:06, 1 September 2017
Stoubora
- Stoubora (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
31 July 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
- JohnStannie (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Fashionista Princess (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Stoubora created Draft:Hallfield School and Draft:Marval Software which were then created by Fashionista Princess: [1] and JohnStannie: [2]. SmartSE (talk) 12:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Late comment after archiving this case
@Ponyo: @Vanjagenije: @Doc James: User:John Stannie is apparently "Brad Arquette" (possibly another pseudonym) of Wikipedia Services according to this undeletion request at WP:RFU. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk endorsed - There are some suspicious similarities in those recreations. Please compare these accounts. Thanks, GABgab 23:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- The following accounts are Technically indistinguishable from each other:
- PvanJaarsveld (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- JohnStannie (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- PacificMusicMan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Fashionista Princess (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Sleepers include:
- Keeley Claire Hawes (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Simon Rex (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Charles Doyle (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- JakeBoyz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- JohnLoganPhotography (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MoneyManLA (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dan Charles Photography (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- HelloTomorrow (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- The way that these accounts are created, used, and intersect looks like a paid editing operation. As they edited solely through a webhost it's technically Inconclusive as to whether they are related to Stoubora. --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks User:Ponyo. Somee sleepers are accounts used on commons to upload images and give the appearance that the claim of them being their own work is true. e.g. C:User_talk:JakeBoyz uploading image for Jake Boys. SmartSE (talk) 21:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- All blocked and tagged as socks of Stoubora. Case closed. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:42, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
@Doc James: Given the intricate nature of this apparent paid editing case, I thought you might be interested in taking a look at the account creations and interactions.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks User:Ponyo will do. Just finishing up on this case[3]. This family has an interesting technique for adding spams links :-( Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes being discussed here at the COIN. As is typical of paid socks none of their first edits appear to be those of a new editor. As they will have blocked accounts that we simply have not connected these newer socks to yet I am happy to apply G5 in addition to G11 to those not worked on significantly by others. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Appears they have a habit of than editing the pages by IPs such as
- 41.114.134.90 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)
- 41.114.167.74 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)
- 41.114.215.29 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)
- Yes being discussed here at the COIN. As is typical of paid socks none of their first edits appear to be those of a new editor. As they will have blocked accounts that we simply have not connected these newer socks to yet I am happy to apply G5 in addition to G11 to those not worked on significantly by others. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks User:Ponyo will do. Just finishing up on this case[3]. This family has an interesting technique for adding spams links :-( Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- These are accounts being used to upload the images
- Paparazzo CH (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- John M. Colaneri (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)